Aliens and Nukes

Video Transcript

Sagan could not have predicted 2021, but he did see it coming. He wrote the following back in 1995 and we quote, "I have a foreboding of an America in my children's or grandchildren's time when the United States is a service and information economy when nearly all the manufacturing industries have slipped away to other countries when awesome technological powers are in the hands of a very few and no one representing the public [music] interest can even grasp the issues. When the people have lost the ability to set their own agendas or knowledgeably question those in authority, [music] when clutching our crystals and nervously consulting our horoscopes our critical [music] faculties in decline, unable to distinguish between what feels good and what's true, we slide almost without noticing back into [music] superstition and darkness. The dumbing down of America is most evident in the slow decay [music] of substantive content in the enormously influential media. The 30-second sound bites now down [music] to 10 seconds or less, lowest common denominator programming, credulous presentations on pseudoscience [music] and superstition, but especially a kind of celebration of ignorance. Roll that around for a while. Those [music] were among his final published words. He died 10 months later. Here we are [music] 25 years later realizing just what he was trying to tell us back then. Aston Forbes, you know that super jacked guy. Malaysian 370 contact Ho Chi Minh 120 decimal niner. Breaking news tonight, a Malaysia Airlines flight with [music] 239 people on board including four Americans has gone missing. Even as these grainy satellite images released today by the Chinese government >> Again, the the Malaysia flight 2 [music] was a was one shot at China saying knock it off. Why shoot it down if it's not hostile? Our technologies [music] permit us to manipulate time and space. By the magnitude? They can distance [music] annihilate. This country is very powerful. Far more powerful than people understand. [music] We have weaponry that nobody has any idea what it is and it is the most powerful weapons in the world. [music] Not even close. I remember the [music] line from the Hindu scriptures of the Bhagavad Gita. The show is trying to persuade the prince that >> [music] >> he should do his duty and to impress him takes on his multi-armed form >> and says "Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds." >> I suppose we all thought that one way or another. >> Woo! Lunatics rise up. Rise up, dorks. Rise up, lunatics, cuz I got to tell you you're going to get a big W. We got our big W in the MH370 videos. For my schizos and my lunatics, it is payday. Guys, those orbs in MH370 videos are not aliens. Nope, sorry. Sorry, alien lovers. They are nuclear weapons. Or as as we redefine them, weapons of mass destruction. You've probably heard that term. Well, there's a good reason for it. Those orbs in the MH370 videos that nobody wants to talk about because it's a CIA technology and the military and the government doesn't want to talk about their secret technology. That's cool. We'd like to talk about it. This is how we got around the thermonuclear weapons test ban. I guarantee you 100% that there is a technicality built into these orbs, probably the fact that they're a neutronic like that. Although I'm guessing it would be contentious that they don't fit into the definition of thermonuclear weapons under the test ban treaty. The idea of the test ban treaty, the reason why I say this, the idea of the tre- test ban treaty is we were worried about radiation, but we would you might accidentally radiate some people that you weren't trying to radiate because you decided to do a test. Well, our explosion isn't really an explosion at all, is it? It's an implosion. It's a black hole bomb that is a neutronic. Assuming that plane comes out on the other side, it's a neutronic means the bomb didn't destroy the plane. So, the main topic of the stream, aliens and nukes. There's this famous connection. They say the aliens started showing up after we dropped the bomb on Hiroshima. Well, that is such a weird coincidence. Almost like there might be a relationship between the two. Tonight is to present to you the argument that nukes are UFOs. The UFOs we see in the sky are fourth generation thermonuclear weapons. Something that has evolved beyond our conventional understanding of nukes. And that we are building those things flying around the sky. They're little fusion reactors flying around in the sky. The human beings are building that. Now, before we talk about that, I saw comments in the chat. Said Ross Coulthart was talking about Salvatore Pais. I don't know if this is true or not. I'm going to assume it's true. I don't watch Ross Coulthart, deep state Ross. What I will say is this, I know why Ross is talking about Sal. No, I'm not going to say. I'm going to do that teaser thing that all the UFO people say when they have inside information, but you know I have it. Why? Because I never say this. I know why. And I'll tell you what. Sal is our number one ally. Sal is our number one ally and he's on record like 10 times saying the MH370 videos are real. And that those videos prove his theories. Salvatore Pais is a US Navy engineer. That has a lot of credibility for people who actually matter in this world. Just keep that in the back of your mind. Okay, let's dig into this. First thing, Matt Gaetz. Matt Gaetz was on with Benny Johnson. We need to talk about some aliens. Before we do that actually, this was a brand new thing. This If this is April Fools' joke, jokes on me. You got me. You got me, Sean Ryan. Sean Ryan, never thought I'd see the CIA looking to advertise with the Sean Ryan Show. And no, this is not an April Fools' joke. He literally got an email from the CIA. They want to advertise with him. It's a little on the nose. A little on the nose. I sometimes I wonder if these podcasters even know how they're being used. Like I think they're actually being used by the CIA and they don't even know they're being used by the CIA cuz they're just oblivious. Like Danny Jones. He's like, "No." Danny Jones is like, "It's normal for some beach bum to become a podcaster and talk to all kinds of government officials. Doesn't that just happen to everybody?" Yeah, man. Everybody gets that. Okay. Let's get focused. Oh, man. We got a lot of good stuff tonight, chat. >> [sighs] >> Now, Matt Gaetz, guys. >> [clears throat] >> I'm not a fan of Matt Gaetz politically. I was once upon a time and then he did his heel turn thing and now I'm super glad he didn't become attorney general. However, I will still listen to somebody if they make good points even if I don't like them. This is what makes me better than them, than the low IQ people. This is what makes all of us better because we can not like somebody, but we can still listen to their arguments. It just turns out the grifters are always grifting and their arguments always suck. So, let's listen to Matt Gaetz. sat on the emerging threats subcommittee that oversaw everything going on in in cyberspace, had access to DARPA and the projects they were working on, had special compartmentalized clearance that is above the clearance of uh of uh of just uh you know a regular congressional briefing. Wow. And so at at I even got to see things that other members of Congress didn't get to see that weren't on the Armed Services Committee. Wow. Uh would do you believe that the American military So, let me point this out. Matt Gaetz did have these positions. The key thing is Matt Gaetz saw the technology that we have in the open world. He wasn't privy to black project technology, but he saw all the stuff the military was acquiring publicly. He was privy to that. And this is relevant because this tells us Matt Gaetz knows if something is black black. Like you don't talk about that when you see that. Because he's seen even the secret stuff that's conventional. Okay? That's an important context to understand. It's true. is using that technology? Studying or using or trying to develop that technology? >> I I I followed closely um the commentary of people who discussed the reverse engineering theories that as we acquire technology that we were not familiar with, we uh transmitted that technology to Lockheed Martin so that they could uh reverse engineer some of the plasma propulsion um concepts that we'd observed and perhaps even >> WOAH, WOAH, WOAH, WOAH. HOLD Stop right there. Woah. If that's me interviewing, it's like wait. Hold up. Who told you Who said plasma propulsion? Who Who told you plasma propulsion? Cuz that's not something I had heard previously. Is that Is everybody just talking about plasma propulsion suddenly and I'm just not hearing about cuz I feel like I might be the world's number one influencer on anyutronic fusion propulsion and I had never heard about this. They were reverse reverse engineering plasma propulsion? Bro, what? And remember, this guy actually has seen our public military technology. and that technology to Lockheed Martin so that they could reverse engineer some of the plasma propulsion um concepts that we'd observed and perhaps even some some of the stealth concepts. That's been chronicled in a number of books and I study The stealth the stealth the stealth concepts from Ben Rich's book that we just did a whole live stream about about how his right-hand man was like the guy that figured out radar technology and all the equations related to it. Mhm. And it sounds like that kind of technology would be exactly what you need to stabilize fusion. Fusion has all these instabilities. If you can understand wave equations better than everybody else, well, plasma we treat plasma like it's a liquid. Waves. It's all about waves. It's actually the more I learn about this, the more absolutely convinced I am that the United States that Lockheed Martin has fusion technology and they're just hiding it. There's no reason we shouldn't have it. We have all of the prerequisites figured out. How have they been hiding this for so long? study that literature and I'm you know, I when you look at the fusion of the defense con >> Is that Is that a Freudian slip he just threw in there? When you look at the fusion are you talking about the fusion of the defense contractors, but it's weird he said that. the fusion defense contractors with the actual military, it is very believable to me that this would be something that would be existing uh as much in the defense contractor space as in the actual military space. So, you believe that the US military has taken advantage of uh like other like alien technology potentially. Yeah, I I I believe that the United States military has benefited from the acquisition of technology uh and and the reverse engineering of that technology. Do I Do I know its origin from aliens or out of space? Uh I just know it's not uh something that is indigenous to our own defense ecosystem. Wow. Yo, keep that clip on speed dial, chat. Doesn't that exactly vindicate the narrative that has been I don't think we We're not inventing this narrative. This is an a narrative that we have come to over studying physics and science and the history of this physics and science that they have a 100% suppressed an extra dimension of energy. Is that he says, "I don't even know the origin, but there is something some technology they are hiding that is beyond what we are seeing conventionally being distributed to the to the military. Lockheed Martin is directly connected to it. No question. And if you research Lockheed Martin, it just everything points directly at them. Directly at them. And that's how they handled it. We learned from Ben Rich's book that they became the toy makers for the CIA. So, the CIA says, "Here you go, Lockheed Martin. Assuming the alien theory is true, which I'm highly skeptical of at this point. They give them a flying saucer. Or better yet, what they do is they say, "Here's the secrets to nuclear weapons. The secrets to nuclear weapons is also the secret to fusion. You give that to Lockheed Martin, you say, "Build me some [ __ ] with this, but it's super secret. You can't give this to anybody. We'll kill you if you do." here's the other thing. The alien cover-up blaming this on aliens, that has CIA written all over it. I'm not saying that's the case, but if I'm the CIA and I've given Lockheed Martin some technology where literally my life is over if the public figures it out. If the public figures out what we're doing, they're going to hang us in public. They're going to chop our heads off in public. You better believe that I would make up an elaborate story about aliens because that gets you off the hook. The CIA is now off the hook for this. They've been building orb fusion orbs, zapping planes away. No, no, no, it's just aliens, man. Aliens did MH370. We don't know anything about that. We were just randomly recording that. We just happened to be in the neighborhood recording with our MQ-9 Reapers. It's the perfect cover. Stupid people are going to eat this [ __ ] up, chat. They're going to eat it up. So, I am extremely skeptical. So, when they break out the aliens and they say that, "Oh, here's these videos." Anna Paulina Luna is going to break out They asked SecWar Pete Hegseth for 40 videos. Guys, you know those videos are going to have plasma fusion orbs in them. I don't have the clip, but in another part of that Benny Johnson interview, Matt Gaetz says he's seen these objects come into formation and move around in formation like they're clearly a single entity and then break apart again. Just like the MH370 videos. I didn't even think that was a big deal, but the orbs individually surround the plane and then they lock into formation. And we know why now. That's just magnetism. So, people are These videos are going to come out. Pay attention right now. They're going to release these UFO videos as part of this disclosure movement. And people are going to be getting sci-op'd left and right. Left and right. Some people Some of the libs are going to make cults. They're going to start praying to the aliens. And there's just going to be orbs flying around. Chris Bledsoe, he's going to become like a Messiah. He'll be like, "Okay, I'm going to tell you what's coming next in the world." Meanwhile, there's going to be no actual aliens. I'm going to be like, "Can you show me one alien body? Just one alien body. Show me the sectoid. Show me the the mantis guy or whatever the shit." And they're not going to break out any of them. There's going to be nothing. I can already see the future, chat. That's why I'm so glad for this because now you guys are going to see those videos. There's going to be orbs flying around in triangle formations. There might even be more complex formations. Who says they can only be triangles? Maybe they'll be like hexagons, other things like that. And you're going to know that that that is fusion. That's a fusion reactor flying around. That's field reverse configuration. You know there's no aliens hiding inside the plasma, but this doesn't even make sense. Where's the alien hiding? He's just He's in the plasma. He's just hiding in the plasma. This is crazy. It's a drone. It's a drone flying around. >> [snorts] >> Okay, that's enough rant. Next thing. >> I can't shout out Zero Point Energy Disclosure enough. I just love his content. The way he shifted his content a little bit away from memes to just factoid posts. And they are This is exactly what I want. Now, I know what it's not what the dum-dums out there want. So, I got to make my posts, you know, more rage-baity, whatever. But, if you just want straight knowledge drops, right here. Ferris Williams proved that Einstein's general relativity is just a subset embedded in five dimensions when you conserve mass. Great point. What is this saying? Ferris Williams said, "Oh, general relativity, the way objects move around." He's like, "If you add an extra dimension, that's just a natural result of conservation laws." All conserve We don't break conservation with free We're not breaking conservation with free energy. We've already broken. We are proof of breaking conservation. Why do we exist? Why is there something and not nothing? Ferris Williams solves that problem. He says, just like we've been saying, there's an extra dimension, there's an ether. This is the reason. This is why relativity exists at all. This is the extra layer that physicists don't want to accept. There is an extra dimension. This is why wormholes are possible. This is why UFOs can even exist at all. This is why plasma suddenly has self-organizing properties. Because the plasma itself has its own electromagnetic nature. And I think they realized the plasma interacts with the medium a long time ago with nuclear weapons. Quick point on Ferris Williams. Ferris Williams corrected the thermonuclear weapons calculations. That's why he's being brought up. It's not random. He corrected the thermonuclear weapons calculations. You cannot say this enough. And it wasn't by It wasn't like, "Oh, he corrected it by 5% cuz he found a rounding error." It was off by 50%. 50%. The nuke weapons were off by 50%. He corrected it. They admitted he was right in a weird tribunal. And then it just got classified. Ferris Williams was so disaffected by this. The guy that figured it out was so messed up by this that he realized all physics is just some [ __ ] that people made up and decided to all collectively believe. He's like, "There's an extra dimension and somehow the rest of the world is just oblivious to this. We're just teaching the world the wrong way. All the textbooks in the United States are wrong." And we kept that secret for, I don't know, 60 years? Longer? Who knows at this point? Who cares at this point how long we've kept it secret? It's been so long at this point, just give us the technology you're hiding. Now, I want to go to this other clip. Deep State Ross. Not because of Deep State Ross, but because of ABE. Kind of hot in a weird way. I don't I don't know. But, also definitely a gatekeeper. Why do I say this? ABE hot, yes. Knowledgeable at science and technology increases the hotness scale in my book. you don't randomly do podcasts, NASA podcasts with um Hal Puthoff and the other dudes without being an insider. Like, I've come to the conclusion that if you can't figure this out, if you're in like her position, then you don't deserve to be in that position, then you're too stupid. These people are clearly knowledgeable on the inside. And I'll say, I know for a fact that I've I've listened to them and seen them in their in their own environment where they're openly talk about this stuff, where they talk completely different than they do on little TV shows and podcasts. Okay, here we go. And a a few years ago, I had an opportunity to introduce David Grusch to someone who'd been in a very senior role, a very senior role at NASA. >> That's true. And because they both had the right security clearances, David gave that person an indication of what he knew about the legacy program and the retrieval of non-human technology and efforts to reverse engineer that technology. And I can remember the former NASA person said to me in some frustration afterwards, "If this is true, I've just wasted the last 50, 60 years of my life. >> If it's true that there's a parallel program going on behind the scenes covertly inside US science, what does that say about the fact that we've got public funding that you've overseen through your role at the National Science Foundation? Fundamentally, if it's true, it's a deceit on the American public and it's a gross misuse. We've put billions of dollars into NASA with old-fashioned rocket technology that goes right back to the 1930s and the 1940s. Not a huge amount has changed in rocket fuel Why is it we keep switching with this? Well, there's so many unflattering images of Ross. I I don't even He's lucky that I'm not that kind of guy. city to self-land and reuse. >> But, ultimately, we're still using rockets to go to the moon and the Artemis mission, which I'm sure we'll get to shortly, it's it's going to be reliant on that rocket technology. The implication though, if there is a reverse engineering effort going on behind the scenes with retrieved non-human craft, can I ask you first, do you believe there is such an effort going on? Do you believe that there are sections of the United States government working in collusion with private military contractors? Wow, okay. Okay. He asked a good question. Chat, I don't know how she's going to respond. I didn't watch this whole clip. How do you think ABE is going to That's Anna Brady Estevez, chat. ABE also known as ABE. Not to get confused with AOC. That's the spicy Latina version. This is the white honky version. I'm going to predict how she's going to respond to this. I think she's going to give a weird political answer. She's going to say, "Yes, I think that I've been exposed to technologies that are breakthrough technologies that are being that might be being worked on." And that if those technologies exist, there should be an effort to get make them public. She's going to say something like that. Let's see. to reverse engineer non-human I mean, I would hope that there have been efforts and I mean, it's been disclosed by many people that there are. So, I think that to to the extent I mean, I've personally seen advanced craft. You know, so I do believe that Is this Is that common knowledge? Does everybody just know Anna ABE has seen advanced craft? What are we talking What? Is she talking about UFO sightings? Someone give me the context there. There there's access to that both in the United States and other places. And so, the the most normal thing is that engineers and scientists are going to reverse engineer and forward engineer. Isn't it pretty dumb then to be focusing a moon mission, landing something on the moon Is she reading something? Do you see her eyes starting to I don't I can't trust these people, chat. Guys, the skitsos have turned me into a skitso now. Look at this. This is why I have to believe Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk. I There has to be something still normal in this world. Ross Coulthart's blinking 120 times a minute. ABE's eyes are going back and forth like a typewriter, like she's reading off a script. This is so creepy and weird. I'm just going to go back like 10 seconds so you can see this. are going to reverse engineer and forward engineer. moon using technologies that are now probably superseded by something in the black? I I think it depends on what's available, but I mean, I'm definitely somebody who's pushing to get access to the most advanced technologies we have and to see how they can be broadly utilized. Called it. Called it. There's a good point to be made there somewhere in that jargon. That good point. We are sending We just randomly are now shooting people to the moon out of nowhere? Suddenly, we decided, "Oh, we're going to the moon again." So, I also want to point out, I always said we went to the moon. I never said we didn't go to the moon. Guys, you to stop getting caught in these easy traps. Things that are just easy to disprove. Like we can see images of [ __ ] where there's stuff on the moon, you know? So, we're just going to go back and we're going to do it again and we're going to do it in our busted ass rocket technology. None of you are prepared for my take on You're not prepared. Get ready to clip it. This is the dumbest decision ever. There There is legal liability tied up in this decision. We are using straight-up knowingly obsolete technology that is dangerous. We are strapping a bomb onto human beings and shooting them to the moon on a bomb. Meanwhile, we've got fusion orb technology that can teleport things. We can clearly do anti-gravity. Why are we endangering human lives for no reason whatsoever? I'm convinced this is why we didn't go back to the moon. It wasn't because we couldn't go back. There was just no reason to go back. There's no reason to endanger people and there's no reason to expose our real techno- technological capabilities. We want to keep that secret. We don't want to be wasting our military advantage by proving we can send people up to the moon. Who cares? There's nothing to do up on the moon. All right. Okay, you know what? I changed my mind. We're going back to the moon and we're going to send all the Redditors. We're going to put all the Redditors into a space shuttle starting with the moderators. There's only like five moderators for the whole site. They'll all fit even though some of them are fat. They're going to go up to the moon. They're going to live on the moon from now on and they're going to harvest the helium for us for our fusion reactors. Guys, I don't think there's enough boron 11. We need Honestly, I don't even care if there's no boron 11. We're just sending them to the moon. We're sending the Reddit moderators to the moon. They're going to harvest the helium 3. I presume this is how it's done. They're going to scoop it up for us, send it back to us and then we will use their their harvesting capabilities, their farming capabilities. They're going to farm it for us to produce fusion down on here Earth for our AI data centers. Chat, why am I not a trillionaire? I'm a goddamn genius. Damn genius, chat. We're solving all the problems. And you know what? Send them up. Send them up on the rocket technology. We're not wasting We're not wasting orb technology on Redditors. That's That's just a non-starter, guys. Send them up on the rocket technology. If we lose a few, it's probably a boon for humanity anyway. Let's watch something serious. Oh, wait. No, let me see if I have anything else. I had a lot of clips. Okay, since everybody wants to talk about aliens and UFOs, that's the only thing anyone watches. Some more Some more clickbait, chat. >> And then you hear it and then lift off and Here we go, clickbait, chat. Enjoy it. Enjoy the clickbait. There's orbs orbs on the tele-tubes on the mind control device, chat. There's orbs on the mind control device. Everyone look. Chris Bledsoe, Ryan Bledsoe was right. They summoned the orbs during the Artemis launch. They're They're watching over us. They're bless The orbs are blessing us, chat. They're blessing [snorts] us. This is I said okay, now there's three orbs. Now it's serious now. Okay, I thought there was just one orb. I was making fun of it. But then you showed me three orbs in a triangle formation and now suddenly you got my attention. Is that You're going to not show me the three orbs again? Are they talking about it? breath until we have that, but they are off to a great start. While we are cheering here on the ground. >> Yeah, I think this is just Okay, guys, real talk. I think this is just like things that are reflecting off the sky. I mean, we're looking at a space launch. Things are flying off of it or something. But anyway, that was a fun time. >> Okay. I don't know if the or the aliens are coming, guys. Look at it like this, guys. Our best bet is not them summoning them down or whatever that is, but our best bet is those videos they're going to show us. We're going to reverse uno the [ __ ] out of them when they bring those videos out. I Maybe I don't say this enough. I feel like I should say it more often cuz we have been saying they've got Aneutronic Fusion Propulsion. They're going to break out these UFO videos of aliens and it's clearly going to be plasma orbs. It's It's going to be like really clear that it's plasma orbs in triangle formations. And we're going to use that to reverse uno the [ __ ] out of their little narrative. They're going to say, "Oh, it's the aliens have come to bless us. Oh, look, they were blessing us with the rocket, too." And we're going to say, "No, this shows why Donald Trump just purchased Tri Alpha Energy. This shows why fusion is going to be the power source for the AI data centers. That's what we're going to focus on. So, speaking of that, here's something for us. The first fusion reactor. Mars. they want to take a fusion reactor to Mars one day. This is Amazon's uh Pulsar Sunbird Fusion Reactor. Now, we're not going to watch this whole thing. You want to know why? Where are the haters at? Pay attention, haters. The reason why we're not going to watch this whole thing is cuz I'm smarter than the person on stage when it comes to fusion. Sadly, we have reached that point where I can already explain it. I can literally just look at a random snippet and be like, "Oh, what are they got explaining? Like is it screenshots here?" When they explain, what's the point? They'll say, "Oh, well, the reason for this is because it's more efficient. It's more efficient than doing uh fission reactions. And the only thing that's more efficient than this is like anti-matter reactions, which we don't even know if we can do, but we probably can. So, he explains all this. Explains the history of fusion reactors, why we have to use how we've been getting better and better at them over time. And what the goal is. Achieving ignition. Perpetual state of confinement. Converting energy into heat or directly to electricity. They don't talk about directed energy conversion very much. But here we go. looking for efficiency because if it's not efficient, again, there's no point in doing it. But that's half the challenge. You know, we can do fusion. Humanity has done this. I mean, looking at the Joint European Torus in 1997. Um the conditions for fusion we're getting better and better at. But once you've got that plasma under electromagnetic confinement, you then need to have to breed your own fuels. You need to be able to maintain the walls of your reactor. You need a steam turbine around that. I mean, this reactor you're looking at now, the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor in Provence, uh this doesn't even have the off-take systems. So, the point is is that once you achieve your fusion So, you know what? I can't even listen to somebody else explain fusion anymore. Dude's like, "Hey, if you do fusion, you need to have a steam for your steam cycle. Everything's steam cycle." No, sir. Aneutronic fusion is not >> Aneutronic fusion is not. Let's skip ahead. One of the biggest ones being that space is the perfect place to do fusion. In fact, it's actually quite an unnatural thing to do fusion on Earth. Um most of the money in in in fusion reactors today uh is spent on very big expensive vacuum chambers. Let's Let's skip ahead here. This is This is an impulse of about 13,000 seconds, which is an incredible >> Whoa, hold up. How would that get us in our portfolio of available systems? This is what the numbers show. So, as a start, you have an incredibly high exhaust speed. Um This is This is an impulse of about 13,000 seconds. Chat. >> That says field reverse configuration on the screen right now. Right now on the screen, he's showing a measure of efficiency and he says, "Why?" He explains, "Why do we do fusion instead of these other mechanisms?" The other mechanisms are good for taking this bottle from the ground to get to space, but once you're in space, you want something that uses a very little amount of input energy and perpetually gives you a little bit of output acceleration. You're fine with it taking a long time. That's where fusion comes in and nothing else comes close. Now, out of all the fusion models that we have researched, where have we focused in on? We have tried to trace fusion going all the way back to the Manhattan Project to [snorts] now. And we found that iterations of fusion leads specifically to Aneutronic Fusion. No neutrons, no radiation. Is field reverse configuration due to its high beta. High beta means extreme efficient use of the magnetic fields. So, the more magnetic field you put in there, the more You're going to get the best output out of a high beta regime, as they say. I love saying that word, regime. which is an incredible number for people who are looking at more ambitious missions. Um but also, as, you know, let's say we start with a relatively inefficient reactor because things will get better. As we develop this and our exhaust systems are start to improve over time, theoretically those numbers can grow as well. Um because as our reactors get bigger and more efficient, up goes your thrust. But even where we were, that suddenly changes all the available missions that we might be able to do. So, how's that look? For us, we went back to the beginnings of nuclear fusion research, which was all linear. Um originally fusion reactors were sort of like a pipe. And the reason for that is the ions like to corkscrew around straight electromagnetic field lines. Um problem was uh when physicists started building fusion reactors that they would leak at the end of the electromagnetic bottle. So, we connected them into a loop and made a torus like a tokamak reactor. And that created more problems and on and on went the energy story. But in propulsion, we don't mind if our electromagnetic bottle leaks. In fact, we kind of want it to on one side. Um Holy [ __ ] Chat, >> if you are a believer and yes, I rarely say this, if you are a believer in the MH370 videos, you are in luck. You have seen the future. You are like five generations ahead of this technology. This is it. He says, this is one of the biggest factors. The reason why we know those are fusion reactors is because it's a linear device. You can see the output coming out of it. One of the things that first things that fusion reactor device uh configuration engineers thought of is, well, let's take our fusion reactor and let's turn it into a donut. Tokamak. So, that it just stays stuck spinning around. But there are problems with this. It's harder to keep it stable that way cuz it wants to leak out. So, going back to a linear reactor and saying, well, we can let it leak out. We'll use that for propulsion. It turns out X-ray thrust is extremely good and efficient for this purpose. So, when you look at those MH370 videos and Ashton says those are X-rays coming out of the orbs. That's exactly what you'd expect from one of these linear FRC reactors. In fact, I can't wait to see one of these in a color thermal. We're only a few years off. And then it's going to be pretty obvious, I think, depending on the design. If we can see one that's completely encased in plasma, it'll be pretty incredible, I think. And this type of reactor is magnetic mirror or field reverse confinement traditionally. Well, I got to slow this down. Did he say magnetic mirror? I think he said magnetic mirror right there. side. Um and this type of reactor is magnetic traditionally. It's interesting Magnetic mirror or field reverse confinement. I've been in fusion for 15 years and we all knew that fusion would be a propulsion source. I remember looking at pieces of a reactor on the ground at at at the Atomic Energy Authority. And we all knew it would one day be a rocket, but the idea of launching a fusion reactor was insane 15 years ago. Um and now we've gone back today. We we've redesigned it around a spacecraft vehicle. Having designed and built propulsion systems, I understand redundancy is incredibly important. What is the point in spending all this money launching something if it if it doesn't work. So, two reactors there. There's there's more reason for the two reactors, but in this limited time, but so you've got trying to build a reliable propulsion system out of fusion here and what it might look like. So, let's put it together. We call it the Sunbird. And what you're looking at is a rock that is designed to live a long time in space because again, if you're going to launch something, it's got to survive at least as long as the reactors. >> Okay, so that's probably enough to understand what they're trying to do. So, it looks like they're they're having their field reverse configuration reactors converge into some kind of super torus or something. And then they're going to use that for propulsion. Hm, interesting. I think that as we see in the MH370 videos, there's an evolution beyond that where it's completely encased in plasma. The magnetic field lines stretch beyond the craft, beyond the inside of the jet. And the inside can probably be very small if anything at all. Some people believe that the plasma itself is just self-organizing. There's nothing beyond just the plasma creating this fusion reaction. That would be like an extremely extremely high efficient low entropy type configuration type setup. Hm, maybe. So, I wanted to show that because look at that. We say, "Wow, the first the first ever first ever fusion uh propulsion engine, guys, happens to be the exact one that I've been saying that we've been saying is being utilized in the MH370 video orbs. I'm not even 100% sure on that. I'm not even sure where the line is between FRC versus pinch effects and mirrors. It seems like there are aspects of them that are all incorporated together. Same with inertial electrostatic confinement. The main idea though is that at the middle you have a well, a potential well. A negative potential well. Or I guess positive. And that therefore attracts the atoms to it. Another aspect is like we looked at with the ultra magnets. Having your mag having magnetic rings that alternate causing all the particles to synchronize up. And then another effect that we looked into was vibration. If you imagine having two plates vibrating, their relative motions to one another would also induce an effect. Now, let's focus on back to the science. What I wanted to show tonight, the big thing, well, okay. Yeah, let's go to this. We'll do Mark Milis at the end. This presentation, this paper about fourth generation thermonuclear weapons. Now, I'm on the record having said that the MH370 video orbs, that technology, is the next iteration of thermonuclear weapons, beyond third generation thermonuclear weapons. But what does that mean? Thank you very much, Mick Leonard. Appreciate you. What does it mean a fourth generation thermonuclear weapon? The military effectiveness and collateral effects. Now, this paper pretty much confirms, I think, what Friedwardt Winterberg said in his 1981 textbook about thermonuclear weapons. One of the things I asked I asked Grock after I kind of looked through this, skimmed through some of the chapters I want to show you guys, is how much does this compare to my theory about the orbs being non-fission reactors, non-fission triggers for a thermonuclear weapon. And I've been going back and forth on my own in my own thoughts. It was whether or not this space-time manipulation requires a fusion bomb detonation or if you can just do this by just jiggling around and other neat little tricks to reduce the Schwinger limit and things like that that we've discussed. Not entirely sure. What I am sure though is that either way you slice it, the orbs and what we see happen is the natural evolution of thermonuclear weapons. That thermonuclear weapons thermonuclear weapons are manipulating space-time. And that we figured out space-time manipulation from thermonuclear weapons. So, here are some of the connections between this paper and what I've discussed. If you watched for a long time, you're going to notice a lot of connections. Fourth generation nuclear weapons describe a shift to pure fusion. No fission primary. First connection, a shift to non-fission triggers. You know what a non-fission trigger is, chat? Plasma orb. Why? Cuz the plasma orbs act as an electric trigger. Instead of a big boom detonating your fusion bomb, you make lightning bolts detonate your fusion bomb. A non-fission trigger. And the reason why is cuz a big bomb vaporizes stuff, melts things. So, instead, let's see what happens we don't use a big bomb. When we just decide to use an electric bomb. So, the paper's first point is that the next generation of thermonuclear weapons is non-fission. It's going to be plasma-based. Are you guys getting it? The Cold War the partial nuclear test ban treaty we found a way around it. Non-fission trigger nuclear weapons, small yield nuclear weapons. Sorry, I'm getting ahead of myself. It describes a shift to pure fusion low-yield thermonuclear devices using deuterium-tritium pellets. Compact non-fission triggers and high-energy density plasma processes. Yields are in the 1 to 100 ton range of TNT with enhanced military effectiveness like neutron heating, directed plasma jets high target coupling and reduced collateral fallout. So, some of the key elements pure fission pure fusion replaces the fissile primary with microgram scale triggers like antimatter pedawatt lasers. The paper specifically calls out pedawatt lasers. Exactly what Salvatore Pais said. Remember when the guys the fusion guys in that X space were like, "Hey, if you were going to do any of this, you'd need like pedawatt lasers." I said, "Yeah, exactly. You need exactly pedawatt lasers. Thank you." Goo goo, what are you doing? Okay. And so uh pedawatt lasers, nuclear isomers, or heavy ions. So, I think this paper is referencing nuclear pumped lasers as well. That's just my my impression. It says, "This compresses and ignites tiny pellets via inertial confinement fusion-like methods." High-energy plasmas 10 to 100 EVs, magnetized fluids, and radiation-driven implosions. The resulting explosions can drive powerful shaped charge jets or forged fragments via an x-ray heating. So, specifically calls out x-ray heating. Compact tunable yields. So, the next generation of thermonuclear weapons has compact yields. Now, when we look at the MH370 videos one of the things that I think nobody can deny that's a compact yield. This isn't destroying the whole Nicobar Islands. This is just zapping this airplane. And it mentions coupling. This is not something I expected in the paper. It talks about coupling. Look at how the plane it looks like VFX because the plane is not there anymore. And your mind can't wrap your brain You can't understand that other than being visual effects. But, if you understand that there's a coupling effect to space-time itself that the orbs are able to pull off here via their geometric orientation and electromagnetic properties then you realize that coupling is vitally important. Coupling then speaks to the geometry. Not only did they figure out pure fusion bombs but they also figured out geometric patterns of waves. Precise geometric patterns of waves cuz remember the videos that they're going to show us that Matt Gaetz is going to was talking about the Annapolina losers shows. They're going to show us precise geometric geometric patterns just like this. And that's a hallmark. That's a hallmark of thermonuclear >> So, compact tunable yields. Now, it doesn't mention this paper does not mention anything about space-time manipulation. However at one point the paper says specifically that there are theorists that believe you can make a black hole bomb with Couldn't believe it. I'll show it to you guys soon. Black hole bomb, the thing that I've been saying it's what I want to make. I think they've already made it. It's all too late. So, the match is relatively close. Even Grok thinks the match is like 60-70%. Now, that's just a made-up thing in general. But, the idea is all on the nose based on what I mentioned other than the fact of negative energy. It doesn't talk about wormholes or space-time manipulation. But, the non-fission trigger effects um resulting exotic effects are you know, speaks to some of those effects, I guess you could say. X-ray etc. Now, who is this guy? Andre Gisponer? Gispooner? I don't know. Swiss physicist. Independent research specializing in nuclear weapons physicist arm control and high-energy phenomenon. Diploma in physics University of somewhere Zurich or something like that. Now, let's go back to this. So, here's the paper itself. This paper begins with a general introduction and update to fourth generation nuclear weapons. Then addresses some particularly important military aspects on which there's been only limited public discussion so far. These aspects concern unique military characteristics of fourth generation thermonuclear weapons that makes them radically different from both nuclear weapons based on previous generation thermonuclear explosives and from conventional weapons based on chemical explosives. Yields to the 100 1 to 100 range, generally enhanced coupling to targets, possibility to drive powerful shaped charge jets. Now this part right here speaks directly to wave shaping. This idea that we can compress our objects and then shoot out a wave a beam in the other direction in the direction that we want it to go to. Enhanced prompt radiation effects. So, you can either turn up the radiation or turn down the radiation. You don't just have to do a neutronic fusion. You could do neutronic fusion neutron bomb that annihilates everything. Reduced collateral damage and residual radioactivity. I don't know if this paper says the words a neutronic but it's definitely alluding to it. black hole. The paper will therefore not address the full spectrum of possibilities that exist for designing new types of nuclear which in the professional scientific literature comprises many concepts including the very hypothetical ones such as quark or black hole bombs. Okay. I didn't know we were just commonly talking about black hole bombs. I thought I was the cool one. I thought I was the only cool one talking about it. Spoiler alert. Chat, spoiler alert. We have black hole bombs. How do I know we have black hole bombs? Um well, I just showed you one. I just showed you a black hole bomb. That's a black hole bomb. You say, "Wait. How is that a black hole bomb?" Well the number one plane just vanished in a black hole. You just saw a black hole vanish that plane, right? That's what I saw. Number two black hole is the same geometric zap zap as a wormhole. The only difference between a black hole and a wormhole is that the black hole is persistent and also the black hole is not entangled to a specific location. You can think of the black hole as just your sprinkler shooting things all out. Versus this kind of black hole bomb has a end point. Choo choo. And it's temporary. And what this teaches us This actually teaches us something very important about the universe. Very important. Pay attention, class. Professor's now speaking. What this teaches us about the universe is that space-time wants to close in on itself. When you look at that it was only a fraction of a second. That was in super slow mo. That's in super slow mo. And space-time heals up, closes up instantly. Keeping that wormhole open is a gigantic feat. That tells us when we're trying to open space-time, that is like trying to lift steel, trying to bend steel. You are good luck. Technically it's possible, but good luck. And the very moment you open it up a crack, boom. Immediately closes down again. That's what that teaches us about And what's interesting about that is that's exactly what is predicted. Is that the problem with space-time is it takes so much energy to loosen it up. Takes this huge amount of energy. If you want to bend that steel, it takes way too much energy. So now, that's why the smart people, the Salvatore Pais of the world, said, "Nah, there's ways around that. There's ways around that. There's Where there's a will, there's a way." Or, he would say, "There are no impossibilities, just conditional possibilities." Back to the Back to the paper. So, let's look at what the topics are. We're not going to go through them all. So, it explains the thermonuclear weapons. You can watch my previous videos about them, basically using big boom to make our small booms. But then fourth generation thermonuclear ones, inertial confinement fusion experiments. Interesting. Interesting because inertial confinement fusion is Sigma 11. Sigma 11 chat, the critical thermonuclear weapons classifications. Critical, as in the most important, highest-level classifications for Sigma 11, that's the code name for the various classifications when they put them on the paper, is inertial confinement fusion. That's like compressing something, like imploding something. Like we just saw a plane get imploded in the sky in an implosive black hole. Hmm, interesting. Micro explosions. We also saw a micro explosion. That was not Naga- That was not That was not Hiroshima or Nagasaki. That was a tiny explosion. Now, it's also a big explosion in the fact that it made a black hole, but it was also a tiny one. Very well-calculated explosion, I might add. Petawatt lasers. Specifically calls them super lasers. SSJ2 laser. Nuclear isomers, antimatter, macro nanotechnology, pure antimatter bombs, {question mark} Target coupling, initial energy from conventional weapons, initial work conventional weapons, coupling to homogeneous or heterogeneous targets. Um shaped charges, shaped plasma-driven jets, and then collateral effects. So, let's go down and take a look at Let's skip through some of this stuff. We know all about the history of bombs. I want the good stuff. What's a fourth-generation thermonuclear weapon? What even is that? Here you go. There's no standard definition. For this paper, what is his definition going to be? Nuclear explosive devices based on atomic and nuclear processes that are not restricted by the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. That might be the biggest yazzi of the entire paper. That might be the biggest yazzi in the paper. I didn't know that. All of what he's talking about here is not limited by the Nuclear Weapon Ban Treaty. So, these designs, pure fusion bombs, specifically get around the Nuclear Weapons Ban. So, I was right. So, I was right. The Nuclear Weapons Treaty is written in a way that it only bans fission triggers. It doesn't ban a non-fission trigger. Holy [ __ ] Grock, are you listening? Ani? Someone fact-check me. Someone fact-check me. I want to see the top reply. Fact-check me. If this is true, then holy [ __ ] we just found the motive. Those orbs in those videos, that's our non- That's how That's how we got around the Nuclear Weapon Ban Treaty. So, technically they're not nuclear weapons. Very, very technically they're not nuclear weapons because we're using them specifically to get around the Nuclear Weapon Ban Treaty. How crazy is that? Nuclear explosive devices based on low-yield thermonuclear pellets triggered by compact non-fission primaries. So, this tells us two things. The Nuclear Weapon Ban Treaty is based on two things. One, the radiation, the fallout. Non-fission trigger gets around that. And number two, the yield. If the yield is too big, then it's considered an illegal nuclear weapon. If it's too radiating, it's considered an illegal nuclear weapon. But, if you do a non-fission trigger plasma ball, then it doesn't count. If you only zap a Boeing 777 and you don't zap it like an island, then it's not considered an illegal nuclear weapon. Holy [ __ ] chat. We solved it. They straight-up built these UFOs, these plasma orbs, because they are getting around the thermonuclear weapons ban treaty. This is how they could cheat the treaty. And we're seeing these orbs flying around and we're thinking it's aliens from another dimension. Yes, there is another dimension, but no, the aliens aren't bizarro creatures. It just turns out we can teleport. We can teleport. Pretty cool. Woo! That's that right there, I got to say. I did not think we were going to find evidence that connects that says they were doing this specifically to get around the thermonuclear weapons ban treaty. Specifically, that's why we're seeing orbs zap MH370. That's so [ __ ] up. Let me just say it again. That's so [ __ ] up. I keep telling you guys, these people are psychopaths. They're not normal people like you or I. And if you keep treating them and thinking like they're normal people, they will keep abusing you and lying to you and taking advantage of you. They are literal psychopaths that are coming up with psychopathic [ __ ] Like, "Oh, we banned nukes." Their very next thought is, "Hey, how can we make some insane [ __ ] that's even scarier than nukes that just gets around the letter of the law?" While from the spirit of it, it still violates the spirit of the of the rule by like a lot. Jeez, man. Sick. Sick stuff, man. And they sit around all day thinking about this. They sit around all This is why I say they definitely made up that alien The type of people that are trying to get around the thermonuclear weapons ban treaty are the same types of people that are going to try to blame it on aliens. Let's just be honest. The The Venn diagram is a perfect circle. Right? The people trying to get around the thermonuclear weapons, they're like, "Hey, the aliens are That's the aliens flying around in their orbs. They're flying around in their plasma Don't read about thermonuclear weapons. Don't read about that. That's just aliens flying around, obviously. Obviously. By the way, shout-out to the CIA. Big shout-out to Ron Pandolfi of the CIA. Shout-out to y'all. I love talking about thermonuclear weapons, and thank you for approving my talking about Cuz if you didn't want me talking about them, you definitely could use your I batphone capability or whatever you do to make like the phone number come up saying you go to jail if you don't call. I know you could do that. Let's just all be honest with each other. We all know you could do that. And the fact that you haven't means that you must approve. So, thank you very much for your approval, CIA. Let's talk more about thermonuclear weapons, my favorite topic. So, look, this This equation right here is for noobs. You know what? It's neat. Basic fusion equation. We're a little We're a little more high IQ. We're a little higher on the futurist scale than Oh, deuterium-tritium fusion. Yay. We're more into uh deuterized lithium. That's kind of our speed. We like aneutronic fusion reactions. And there's only three. Helium-3, the Redditors are going to farm the helium-3 for us on the moon. It's been established. Boron-11. We'll have people dig that out of the ground for us, possibly immigrants, who knows. And number three, lithium-6. Lithium-6, the secret ingredient nobody talks about. It produces a huge amount of output energy in the form of electricity directly. No steam cycle. No steam cycle. Interestingly, number one, the biggest inertial confinement fusion facility is the National Ignition Facility. J- uh John Knuckles. John Knuckles is the one that started that. John Knuckles and Lowell Lowell Wood. Lowell Wood. They were the ones that were coming up with this idea of making a black hole and using that as a reactor. These guys themselves were dreaming of space-time manipulation, of using thermonuclear weapons to traverse the stars. How could I even make that up? >> [gasps] >> Let's go down to some more of the fun stuff. So, anyway, basic idea, as you see, it's really simple. Shoot your beams onto your target. Focus the beams onto a single point in the middle and force it to implode upon itself. That's what we're trying to do. And look at the MH370 videos. What do we see? We see three orbs spinning around the plane and they they pull in onto the plane and they implode the plane into a The physics are fundamentally the same as what you see from inertial confinement fusion. Micro explosions. So, they figured out we can make micro explosions and here even talks about using lithium deuteride as one of your fuel sources for this. The energy release is huge. Now, fusion is not as high as fission on the energy release. And interestingly, if we could get to matter-antimatter annihilation, theoretically, that would be the highest level, according to the to the physics. Petawatt class lasers. Two issues with exploding a nuclear pellet, imploding the pellet to high density as fast as possible, and to ignite the pellet by heating it the moment it has reached maximum compression. Those were the two problems. Both of those problems are solved with lasers. Number one, why is a petawatt laser so high energy? Because it focuses the energy down in time. One of the ways to increase energy density is to increase decrease the time scale of the laser. That's why atto-second lasers are more powerful than peta uh than um pico pico-second femto-second lasers. Yeah, femto-second lasers. The shorter you go on the time scale, the higher the energy density gets. So, right here it's saying, well, one of the biggest problems is getting the time scale down as far as possible, to implode as fast as possible. And then to heat it at the exact right moment. Basically, the second part is saying, you want the ions to be at the temperature required for fusion. Well, we got a we got something for that, too. The laser also solves that. Because the laser can be tuned to a specific energy level. Super high energy Why is that important? Because now the laser beam is entering your fusion plasma at the temperatures already ready to go for fusion. So, lasers solve all our problems. Lasers solve all our problems in fusion. Number one, we get our fusion reaction happen very quickly. Number two, we beam our our fusion reaction with the ions at the temperature we want or near Compressing the pellet without excessively preheating it is called adiabatic If I Google David Kirkley a- adiabatic compression right now, am I going to find a scientific paper from the Helion Fusion CEO about this exact topic? I feel like I'm going to. Hold on, I'm going to do it on the side just in case I end up being wrong and I look stupid. Uh David Kirk Kirk- it's Kirkley, right? Kirkley, yeah. Adiabatic compression. Let's see what happens. This is either going to be really cool or really lame. W- W- W- Uh-oh, chat. Uh-oh, Let's see what we found. Would you Would you look at this? OMG. Fundamental scaling of a- a- adiabatic compression of field reversed configuration. Would you Well, look at chat. Who does more scientific paper research than Ashton Forbes? Please, find one person. Fundamental scaling of adiabatic configuration thermonuclear fusion generators with magnetic energy recovery. basically, this was David Kirkley saying that, "Oh, we can do fusion with plasmas. We can make this work the same thing this guy's talking about right here. We can do this with plasmas in a fusion reactor. We don't need lasers to actually be the main mechanism. We can have the plasma do it. We can feed the plasma some laser action. Mm, delicious. Delicious lasers. So, compressing it without preheating. So, this is a completely different idea than what we're doing with tokamaks and all this stuff. Just heat up the box. Hot fusion says just heat up the box. We're not just heating up the box anymore. Now we're saying, "Hey, we're not going to preheat this. We're just going to shoot the laser beams in there at the temperature that we want." So, part of this is they they require these huge facilities to pull this off. Now, let's skip ahead. Uh what is this one? Nuclear isomers are long-lived excited states of atoms nucleus. Some nuclear isomers are naturally occurring, but most of them produce in artificial nuclear reactions by colliding beams of nuclei. Nuclear isomers decay back to the ground state after some time. If a method could be found to release that energy instantaneously in a gamma-ray burst, rather than slowly at random over time, one would have a new method for controlling high energy storage and release. Huh. Well, this is interesting. So, what this seems to imply is that if you were to take your atom, that atom has inherent energy, potential energy built into it. And if you were to squeeze that, you could squeeze a little bit of energy If you were to expand excite that energy state, it could store that energy. The atom could store that energy like a balloon. Like filling up a balloon and then release it later on. If you could harness that, if you could control that process, like controlling the trampoline, you could in theory control a huge amount of energy release. That sounds very similar to how Pudoff's ground state of the hydrogen atom theory. Hm. And then antimatter, Okay, I'm going to skip the antimatter part here. All this antimatter stuff is too too far out there for me. Uh okay, pure antimatter bombs. That's not what I want. Target coupling. How effective it uses the energy. So, target coupling has to do with if we want to destroy this object, then I want this bomb to only destroy this portion of this object. This is just like what that CIA lady was saying when she was talking about, "We can shape a charge the uh width of a gnat's eyelash." They can control the charge far beyond the shape of the explosion, beyond what you could possibly imagine. That's essentially what the coupling mentions here. And I think that speaks to this idea that you would have to have perfectly shaped charges to reach the efficiencies required for space-time manipulation, to loosen space-time up so that we can make that black hole bomb, you have to have perfect charge shaping. They have it. They have it. We know they have it because we're watching it. Oh, is this one of the things it says? Somewhere in here it says that electromagnetic energy. When you go up high enough, it all becomes about electromagnetic energy. In non-nuclear weapons is known the lethal energy is initially in the form of heat and pressure. The two basic manifestations of thermodynamic energy. This is because chemical detonation reaction leads to a very fast composition decomposition of explosive material. So that reaction the reaction products left after detonation are very hot and under very high pressure. So this is the reason why you die basically in explosion. Nuclear weapons issue is quite different cuz the lethal energy that affects the immediate surrounding is mostly in the form of radiations, electromagnetic radiations, x-rays, gamma rays, nuclear radiation such as neutrons. Kinetic energy of the expanding material of a nuclear bomb generally corresponds to a small fraction of the radiated So you can have x-rays are going to be released. We think there are x-rays being released in the MH370 videos. If you look at the pure fusion bomb, it says you're going to see 14 MeV neutrons and you're going to see some soft x-rays. Now if it's gamma rays that are being released, which it could also be in theory, then it could be a different type of bomb. They have different variations of the bombs, positron bomb, anti-proton bomb, isomer bomb, etc. I think this is where it says right here. Uh Oh yeah, the properties of the bomb, which is the thing. Okay, well you know what a bomb does. I'm going to skip all that. Mhm, what was the thing I wanted to see? Oh, this part. Conventional explosives in first and second stage nuclear weapons primarily couple their energy by means of a shockwave propagating through the medium. Now I didn't know this, but this is relevant. The shockwave and the shockwave physics is the same physics they use to figure out their plasma orbs. And so now here you have this concept that's being connected saying that the shaping of these waves and this is the coupling because essentially you're saying the wave is going to drive the motion. So if we could ride this wave, then in theory we could create a a wormhole where we're riding this wave that is from our outside perspective looks like it's moving faster than the speed of light. But from within the bubble, we know that's not really what's happening. In the case of fourth generation thermonuclear weapons, the coupling can be quantified >> as a direct unless the target is sufficiently far away from the point. So in other words, the fact that the weapons are primarily very intense sources of penetrating radiation means they can produce direct work on the target and therefore induce very different response than if the target was just hit by a shockwave. Now if I'm reading that correctly, that's like saying we can manipulate the space-time around the target. Because we can control how the waves interact and we can do control the amount of lethality lethality, the radiation that's involved in the bomb. I don't think and this is where the paper at the beginning says, I want to discuss things that people I don't think are aware of. This is one of those things that I don't think I've ever read a paper about nuclear weapons that discusses this, but it's important because it's real aspect of the of the technology. Okay, um let's see. Let's see what else I wanted to look at here. Okay, forget the coupling stuff, the jets and particles. We already kind of talked about the field reverse configuration stuff. So you already know somewhat about that with the x-rays that can be used as an source of propulsion. Conventional shape charges, nuclear shape charges, mhm. Collateral effects, we know about a neutronic effects. Okay, I think that's good enough for now. Weirdly like I already we already reviewed most of this here. Okay, let's do this part. All explosive process this is the electromagnetic effects. All explosive processes chemical or nuclear produce electromagnetic effects of varying duration and intensity. The best known of these is the electromagnetic pulse EMP pulse effect, which is pronounced for fission explosions in the atmosphere where high energy gamma rays generate current of Compton recoil electrons, which further ion produce ionization so the air becomes conductive. Huh, that's how by the way that's how the um pre-ionization of the plasma works, too. It can turn the air conductive. >> Normally the air is a resistor. But there are other electromagnetic effects associated with high-altitude fission explosions such as the formation of radiation belts around the Earth. Fission is the dominant source of electromagnetic effects so that pure fusion bombs will have significantly reduced effects. So if we are looking for nuclear weapons to tie to UFO technology, the perfect connection is space-time manipulation, a wormhole. Because it turns out when you get rid of the A-bomb, of the big boom, now suddenly your fusion bomb now is no longer lethal anymore. It's no longer lethal. The radiation effects are significantly reduced. And then the question people should wonder is what is it doing? If it's not blowing things up, what is that energy doing? The logical conclusion is that energy is manipulating space-time. It's either softening space-time or just straight up changing it. Creating a bridge. Last thing for tonight. >> Mark Millis. Mark Millis. >> Mark Millis did a spooky video on the Science Channel about his BPP. And I looked at the list of attendees last week on this BPP and it's a who's who of black project engineers. Why did Mark Millis do that video? Why? Guy Guy was the leader of the Breakthrough Physics Propulsion Program and they clearly in that video are insinuating that we figured out anti-gravity. And Mark Millis is like, sign me up. Make the music extra spooky when I drive outside of NASA Glenn to do this video shot. I looked at that list and the BPP list, those presenters on that list, Here's James Woodward, Mach's principle and impulse engines towards a viable physics Star Trek. I could go through this, but you guys are going to get the point. The people that are the presenters of this and the topics they're presenting, it's not just an overlap. It's literally the physics that we've been talking about. Every single one is a hitting the nail on the head. I was just looking for John Cramer in here. Not only was he a presenter, not only was he a presenter. I mean, look at the list. Holy [ __ ] Raymond Chiao, John Cramer. I don't know these other two guys. Robert Forward, Bernard Haisch, Alfonso Rueda, Daniel Cole. Both of these all three of these dudes co-wrote papers with Hal Puthoff. All three of these guys did. It's actually unbelievable. And Robert Forward is Eric Davis's mentor. There's George Miley right here. Presented on day two. There's Mark I mean, I just look at this and I go, this is where they figured it out. This is it if humans figured out the teleportation without alien help or whatever, this is when it occurred. The CIA figured it out when these guys figured it out and they buried it. They buried the whole program. Pretend like this never happened. We didn't find anything you need to look into. Don't worry about space-time manipulation. Like this is a who's who of zero point energy wormhole people going on here. Bernard Haisch worked for Lockheed Martin. Probably several more of these. Oh, Hal Puthoff. I didn't even see Hal Puthoff right near the top. Hal Puthoff was the second speaker. Hal Puthoff was the second speaker after they had their token their token debunker Lawrence Krauss. I got to find out what Lawrence Krauss's deal is. I found a video about Mark Millis explaining warp drives. We're just going to watch it cuz, you know, whatever. Pretty interesting. Educational video. Uh we only do science here. Here you go. No pol- We never talk politics or anything like that. Tell me about Tau Zero. Why was it created and what is its goal? When I was running the Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Project, I had met a number of uh people that were worth keeping in touch with. The ones that could be visionary and incredible at the same And, you know, what the kind of things that they were doing are on the pioneering edge. And as NASA quit supporting that project, um Okay, I'm only 5 seconds in and I'm already convinced. >> [laughter] >> The first thing he says is, "Hey, we were doing this revolutionary research." And I was like, "Hey, I should probably keep in touch with these dudes." Uh yeah, cuz you guys figured out freaking teleportation. You guys figured out teleportation and I don't know, some of you are probably prob- If you're the smart ones, you're probably profiting off of it. I would be. I would be. By the way, screw telling everybody else about it. They They made the right choice hiding it. Let's just be real. And they did let me continue for several years there on um without any funding just on center overhead to finish the documentation, which was great. But eventually, with NASA wanting to go back to the moon and Mars and um they were cutting all research. So, it was kind of clear that uh this isn't going to work. Meanwhile, I had just completed what was called a Master's of Physics Entrepreneurship, which is from Case Western. In short, it's to help those scientists and engineers whose work might stumble on a potentially marketable product how to turn that into a business or even if you want to. And in my case, I used that to uh create the Tau Zero Foundation as a nonprofit to keep that network of people that I had met, the ones that were adventurous and credible uh together. Uh the thought being Chat, the Bible. The Holy Bible, chat. Where's my Bible? O M G O M G, chat. Oh my god. I was about to have a panic attack. Wait a minute. Wait a minute, chat. This book might be fake. Chat, that that color is a different color than this image. Holy [ __ ] chat. I just debunked this book. Chat, th- this text isn't even the same. It's not even in the same format. Holy [ __ ] this whole book just got debunked. It's all fake. I just holy debunked this. Wow, I'm the number one debunker Redditor ever. Wow, look at me. Okay, enough jokes. April Fools. Hee hee. means that, you know, right now, informal volunteer contributions. And once I left NASA, then I was able to actually look for funding with the intent of hopefully finding philanthropists who would chip in. And after having shown that, yes, these people with virtually no funding were actually making progress, if you give us more money, we make more progress. the other aspect of that is we used the theme of Interstellar more to separate us from what the other aerospace community was doing, which is how do you extrapolate what we know how to do, moon bases, Mars bases, expansion into the solar system, that sort of stuff. With Wait, what year is this video from? 6 years ago. We By the way, only like 300 views on this. I love the videos only have like 300 views. We know how to do moon bases and Mars bases. Sorry, if we know how to do moon bases and Mars bases, um could you just let everybody else know? Maybe share that information with the class? Does this guy know about Does he know about a secret space program? So, guys, I'm still not convinced by the secret space program. I mean, I know we got fusion orbs that can teleport things, but that doesn't mean we got interstellar astronauts, right? Why is this guy talking about we can do moon bases and and and and and Mars bases? And that was seen as like legitimately crazy talk. Still kind of is, but they're literally now saying we are going to build a moon base. Apparently, we are doing a moon base. I don't know why. Actually, that's not true. I know why. The Redditors are going to go live up there. They're going to harvest our Actually, you know what? I'm in support of the moon base suddenly. Suddenly, I'm warming up to the moon base, chat. It's conceivable with the technology that we can envision. Uh whereas interstellar flight is such a harder challenge. Uh you just can't do that with extrapolation. So, you have to look for completely different modes of operation. But to make an analogy, it would be like while in World War II, while most of the aerospace engineers were trying to think of how to make more efficient piston propeller aircraft, smoother airframes, you had some people that were contemplating jet engines, um which was a completely different propulsion method, and uh completely different principles and and how to make it work and make and make it work well. And once that succeeded, that took jet aircraft into a uh another realm. Other just quick examples is it's like the difference between carbon paper and a photocopy machine, between steamships and sailing ships, rockets and aircraft, transistors versus vacuum tubes. So, while most of the technical community is looking at the next turn things, which is necessary, uh someone should also be looking at, okay, what other thing what they Okay, let's skip ahead of that. Because what's he saying there? He's saying basically, this is how we've missed How come Christopher Columbus didn't fly here on an airplane? Was airplane technology Did it not exist? Was it Was Was the physics not real back in the Christopher Columbus time? No, they didn't have the material science to do airplanes. They had boats. Now, boats are stupid. And then now we have airplanes, but now airplanes are going to be stupid because now we can do space-time manipulation. That's what he's saying. I just did it in a lot shorter way. gaps are and you have enough information to take the next Okay. Or do you go back to the physics uh the And here you go, you can see fusion, blah blah blah. >> sciences to see if there are are new discoveries which can circumvent the limits of that technology. The analogy of propulsion physics, the line of it just being science fiction into the beginnings of science was roughly in the last half of the prior century. Um the notions of traversable wormholes for faster-than-light, I think, entered the literature in 1988. Uh the warp drive concept, 1994. And then there has been a variety of concepts for how do you move spacecraft without using rockets or sails, and they kind of spread from 1960s with some refreshed work in 1997. And on >> Now, this as a nerd, this is my jam. He's saying the first wormhole theoretical papers was 1988. Miguel Alcubierre's warp drive, 1994. And then he says, "For alternative propulsion concepts, those have existed since the '60s onwards." Do you know what he's talking about there? He's talking about fusion propulsion. That's exactly what he's talking about. Those fusion propulsion concepts have existed in some form since the '60s, since inertial confinement fusion science started taking off. Since John Nuckolls and Lowell Wood. That on those topics were at the point where the fidelity of the questions is now good enough, and the amount that we do know and don't know is understood well enough that we know what to do to chip away at the unknown. So, it's now in a Two more points. Number one, this this This sounds like somebody who knows. This sounds like somebody who knows and he's trying to explain to the children what's going on. Also, when it comes to the alien topic, which is tonight's live stream, this is a main part of the reason why I'm skeptical of the alien topic. Because you look at this and you go, "Wait a minute, wormholes came into the literature in 1988. Warp drives come into literature in 1994. We've got all this plasma research going back to the '60s, and then right around the year 2000, just a few years later, 10 years after that, year 2000, this BPP program happens. All the smartest dudes are there. Zero All the zero-point energy influencers are there. They figure it out. The timeline just makes perfect sense for them to figure out teleportation in the early 2000s, right after this BPP. And this would mean the orbs in the MH370 videos, they're not experimental, but they're also relatively new. They're less than 10 years old, which is new in the in the military world. At least in 2014, they were. And this to me makes sense because it explains the extreme level of secrecy around those videos. You might say, "Ashton, you show the videos every day." Yes, but do you see how people treat me? People act around me. People avoid saying my name. People avoid talking about those videos. That's because some people are stupid, yes. Other people have specifically been told, "Don't talk about those videos. Don't talk to that guy. Don't talk about anything related to that." Because that's not old technology. In theory, the physics is old, for sure. But the actual technology still harms national security by that being exposed. So, I understand. Respect to the debunkers. Respect to the CIA agents and operatives who have been trying to discredit me and ruin my life. I know it's not personal. I know you're just doing your job. And so am I. I'm just doing what I like to do, too, which is talk about It's fun. It's fun to talk about. Nobody gets to talk about it. So, thank you again. Okay, back to the topic at hand. So, Mark Millis explains the evolution of warp drive, wormholes, etc. Keep going. things that happen can be very confusing for uh new students to try and sort out. Is this stuff real? You know, where where is the real stuff that we can start working on today? So, to try and figure out some way to present that information to the public. And with that, um we're in close collaboration with Paul Gilster, Centauri Dreams. He does an article five times a week on things related interstellar based off of those things which are uh So, he made this Tau Zero organization to help disseminate the knowledge of space-time manipulation. So, Mark Millis retires or whatever, joins Tau Zero, and he's like, "You know what? We're going to disseminate the knowledge of space-time manipulation, gravity, and we're going to try to help inventors who are interested in this." This is like this is the same thing Charles Chase is doing, right? Why are all these people all decided the same? This is like when you get a conscience. Like you can see what's happening, right? If you're you're Sigmund Freud and you're diagnosing these people psychologically will stay. You're like, "This person's got a lot of guilt." This person has a lot of guilt for all the [ __ ] that they've been hiding, and they want to help get some of it out to the public. Or, you know, a more bene- uh beneficial way or um a favorable way of saying it for them would be that they know this technology is real, but they don't want to be killed by Lockheed Martin. They don't want to become the next General McCaslin. Right? They don't want their wife to go out for a doctor's appointment and then to come back and they're just gone forever. No trace whatsoever. Right? And so, they know that since they can't just come out and say it, the next best thing they can do is create these little foundations that get funding from people sources that can do experiments that can prove the research and science is real. What it takes though is for open-minded people, you all, high IQ futurists, to see through the academics and their their claims of pseudoscience and to look at the actual experimental results. in the peer-review journals. And when sometimes there's something more controversial, at least the uh the things on that have grounding. When I left NASA, it was uh clear to me that there was not going to be any government funding on anything very long range, at least not for a long time. And I wasn't even going to try for government funding. Um so, the the monkey wrench in my plans was when DARPA uh started the 100 Year Starship. And uh they wanted it as their own organization rather than availing themselves to the uh groups that already existed, like the British Interplanetary Society and uh what we had already started, Tau Zero and Centauri Dreams. And they also dangled $500,000 for that. So, this network that I used to have with the people I met over the years where good-spirited collaboration realizing that there was hardly any funding on this and that it would be a a slow road to get it. Uh that collaborative community turned into pockets of competition, which uh I was not expecting. >> Wow. And and that sort of uh changed the climate on how things were done. And so, right Do you what he's [clears throat] saying right here is so it basically mirrors what Dr. Greer's been saying? Dr. Greer's been saying a lot of these guys, they get killed because they get greedy. They want to make money off their invention. And here Mark Millis is saying the same thing. He says, "I tried to keep in touch with all the guys that figured out the teleportation technology." I'm adding that part at the end. But they started getting they started getting greedy. They started getting competitive with one another. Of course they did. They figured out teleportation technology, and now everybody who was there knows now it's a race for all of them to try to make money, to sell it to Lockheed Martin, to sell it to Raytheon, to sell it to the Air Force, to sell it to the CIA. And the best part is they can steal it because the CIA doesn't care. It's never going to become public anyway. So, go ahead and steal somebody else's design, steal their idea. We don't care. We're going to build it out. No one will ever know. We'll have perfect plausible deniability. Honestly, the problem is all of us, chat. This is why I'm so disaffected. We've got psychopaths in charge, complete psychopaths in charge, running the show. The engineers are greedy as [ __ ] None of them really care about the world. And the reality is they're all right. They're right. We should be covering up. People are really that stupid. The fact that I'm the person revealing this, I'm the person most disgusted by that fact. The fact that I'm the most trusted source in UFOology, no one is more disgusted by that than me. Keep going. Keep going, Mark Millis. You're on a roll. I would say right now, uh the biggest challenge for Tau Zero is uh finding the right kind of help to just take care of some of the business details to keep us going and uh surviving while we wait for the network of the people who can actually do the work to stabilize back down into something more collaborative. So, let me just break down what what he's saying here, guys. What he's saying here is Hal Puthoff, Eric Davis, and the rest of them, they went off and decided to go join the black world. They decided, "Fuck that. We're not going to go to reveal this. You going to go on your little, you know, holy mission to reveal the technology to the world. Good luck with that." Good luck going against the CIA and the deep state who's been hiding this technology for 60 years. They said, "We're going to go just build it for them. We're just going to build it for them. We're we're jumping the uh picket line. We're going to become the scabs." And they did it for them. Right? And I'm speaking hypothetically here, so don't sue me, Hal Puthoff. But that's what they did. And then he's saying there's only so many engineers that can do this. Tom Bearden spoke about this all the time. Tom Bearden said there's only so many engineers that understand this. So, you say, "Why don't they just build this?" Because the ones that know are in hot demand. The ones that can actually do this stuff reliably and and prove it. I'll give you an example, Dave Rossi. Dave Rossi is an example. Why do you guys think that a young guy like Dave Rossi is a defense contractor? Because he can actually build this [ __ ] He can actually build it for them. And that means he's going to be in high demand. And that means if he gets called a pseudo scientist in the public world or whatever people want to [ __ ] talk him, it doesn't matter. In fact, it's kind of a benefit. Kind of a benefit cuz it means there's going to be less competition for his services from the people who have no idea. And so, you would imagine the Hal Puthoffs of the world and the other guys like that, similar situation. High-demand people. And you make them sign a lot of NDAs, as many NDAs as you can make them sign. Non-compete agreements, anything. This is why the smart ones are third party. Third-party consultants. Because they're now not beholden. Like if you join a big company, you have all these requirements, non-compete clauses, all this [ __ ] you have to deal with. That means that when you leave, you can't touch any of that information. When you are a third party, yes, you still have to deal with NDAs and stuff, but you have a lot less restrictions. A lot less. So, I think that's probably an I think this is mostly just about the Tau Zero. Is there any more? Let's see. transforming from a Yeah. of between two to 6 million not on sales pitches, but on what seems reasonably accurate to sort out. After that, what I would love. If there was enough funding for supporting research, which So, here's the other part. A lot of this is about funding. And the reality is most of these companies are going to go they're going to go bankrupt. Like the CIA is not going to support somebody who's publicly trying to expose this One of the things you learn in business, it's not about what you know, it's who you know. This is why Palantir just won the big deal for the AI for the military. We all saw it coming. Cuz it's who you know. Uh Peter Thiel is CIA, former CIA connections. Of course they're going to trust him with the next level, with the the the big company that's going to control the AI of the of the world, of our military. So, let's wrap this all up. Long story short, guys. Nuclear weapons manipulate space-time. That's the first thing you need to understand. That's a concept. The idea that a big boom, a very, very efficient high energy detonation will bend that space-time that is normally extremely stiff. Non-fission triggers, fourth generation thermonuclear weapons are the UFOs that we're seeing flying around in the sky. Fourth generation thermonuclear weapons that were designed to get around the thermonuclear weapon ban treaty. Designed to get around the treaty. Low yield and not radioactive. Those are the two mechanisms used to get around the treaty. But that still allows enough design room to build a wormhole machine, a a black hole bomb that temporarily creates a slight bridge in space-time that closes back up. Or another way to look at it would be to say from a relativity perspective that the plane is becoming a beam of light. From our perspective, it's moving at the speed of light as a beam of light but from the perspective of the plane the space is just becoming shorter and shorter between the two points. Okay guys, let's go to the super chats. Thermonuclear weapons are UFOs. Isn't This is the most Luz ever been on stream guys. Like I know. She doesn't ever jumped up on on the couch like that in the middle of the stream. Super cute doggo chat. Super cute doggo. Okay, pill chat. Thank you very much Pauli who gifted the shades for Quantum. Thank you very much for those shades. Appreciate you Pauli in the super chats or in the uh pill chat. Raising Cane gifted the gold pills. Thank you very much Raising I appreciate you man. And yes, they need a plausible explanation for when Donald Trump declassifies all this ancient Personally guys, I do not care. I do not care what the answer is to technology. I don't care where it comes from, doesn't matter to me. I don't care if it's a thousand years old, 50 years old or whatever. At this point, just give it to us. Number one thing is not to fight over its origin, not to fight over who is most right about the physics. A lot of people were. Number one thing is give us the damn technology. Give us the free energy technology. Jesus, what are we even waiting for here? >> Rumbled chat, which is getting bigger and bigger by the way. Shout out to you guys. I want to thank Laughing Cat, Double M's, all the all the common people. Herb Green as well. Appreciate you. And then our super chats. XLX Squee, disclosure bro, we are the aliens. This is my favorite theory which to me makes the most sense. Which is what they call it abiogenesis or whatever the hell it's called. Like the idea that we came from Mars or something like that. I'm taking it a step further. Take it a step further chat. Battlestar Galactica based on true events. Based on a true story. Humans got stranded. Humans went through a portal to Earth and we got stranded here. And then we had to have sex with the monkeys here. The Neanderthal people and now we became humans. Boom. Mind blown chat. That's honestly what I think is going to end up being the most accurate out of all this at the end of the day. It's going to be There's not secret space aliens coming to visit us. We really just were the aliens and we got stranded here and now it's been 10,000 years we've been stuck on this stupid planet. Some crap like that. >> XLX Squee says, I told you that a torus is no joke but you said it best, stars are not donuts. So I hit sphere. Mainstream needs to catch up, way behind. When it comes to fusion, we're so far ahead it's actually absurd at this point. I didn't think we could get this far ahead on fusion that quickly. Field reverse configuration, high beta. My favorite's high beta. Like you literally just look at the equations and you can tell that a high beta fusion reactor is always, in every scenario, going to be better than a non-high beta fusion reactor. I mean, a tokamak is a useless. It means a tokamak is freaking useless. Just crazy. Just based on the geometric configuration of the fusion reactor. Wild. Mick Leonard, best podcast in the universe. No, you're the best Mick Leonard. Appreciate you. Degen specialist, there are too many limiters on Earth for fusion to advance the way most wanted to. Yes, this was actually pointed out in one of those clips we were just watching. Space is the perfect location for fusion to happen. But that does not mean we can't do it on Earth. We've limited our mindset. If you realize we can do space-time manipulation then you realize we can do space right here on Earth. That's how they were able to get those coherent fusion reactors, those plasma balls. Cuz those plasma balls they represent ignition. They represent a perpetual fusion reactor, not just an a second. We're watching a fusion reactor flying around for 30 seconds straight with no interruption. That's a huge breakthrough. Degen specialist EUV lithography creates plasma hotter than the sun by shooting laser twice at microscopic droplets of molten tin. Yes. And it's going to get better than that. I found out early on that lithography lithography is basically us figuring out UFO technology. Because we're making our materials smaller and smaller, making the most accurate geometric shapes on our little microchips. And it turns out those geometric shapes are the way you harness zero-point energy. The way you harness this ambient energy. You create a waterfall. Where there was balance, you create an imbalance and you harness that. And if you do that you can get free energy. My channel, so many Schwinger's, no limit, can bring down the Schwinger limit. Schwinger limit is when space-time rips apart. Then matter antimatter pairs come flying out. Schwinger limit is when the black hole gets created. If you get to the high enough energy boom, black hole bomb. However, we can bring that limit down. Bring it down because we jiggle the medium a little bit. Jiggle the medium, soften it up. And then it'll stretch much easier. Timothy Foster, thanks for teaching Ash and fellow Orbeez. Carry on. Thank you Timothy Foster. Jalil Robinson, thank you for coming back. Awesome stream. Thank you guys for being here and Zapperu and Zapperiah. Thank you Ash for all the time. You consistently fantastic streams. Love to Lulu best chat. And great plan Redditors to libs to the moon. Love from Zapperiah and Zapp. Appreciate you guys so much. Guys, we have some other amazing content for the future but I will be off on Friday. We'll have a special thing dropping probably next week or whenever. After that, I got a thing this weekend. And then next week we'll be back. And the following week I'll be off. I wish I could say vacation but I got a big work thing coming up. Thank you MH370X. Have a great night. We'll be back on Monday. Later everybody. Peace out. >> Out in the fields [music] where the skies are wide. Talking about a journey through the cosmic [singing] ride. Einstein and Thorne, they set the stage for trip through time across the space age. Wormholes connect distant points [music] in space. Traversable paths to a far off place. No black holes pull, no crushing weight. Just a cosmic tunnel to a distant gate. Talking wormholes, stargates, [music] negative energy. Travel through the cosmos, it's our destiny. MH370, [music] where did it go? Boeing 777 through a wormhole flowing. Talking wormholes, stargates, [music] negative energy. Travel through the cosmos, it's our destiny. [music] MH370, where did it go? Boeing 777 through a wormhole flowing. >> Exotic matter, [music] negative energy is the key to stabilize a wormhole [singing] for you and me. Quantum vacuums squeeze so tight, creating conditions for this wondrous flight. [music] Static fields and lasers in the lab they play, generating forces in a new kind [music] of way. Gravitational squeezing, Casimir force, negative zones we need to stay the course. Talking wormholes, stargates, negative energy. Travel [music] through the cosmos, it's our destiny. MH370, where did it go? Boeing 747 through a wormhole flow. Thin shell [music] formalism played so fine. Spherical geometry we realize. Energy [music] conditions that we must defy. For stable wormhole, let's give it a try. >> Gravitational forces balancing [music] the plate, creating the throat, opening the gates. From Earth to the [music] stars in a single bound. A shortcut through space profound. Engineers [music] and dreamers hold the key to future worlds and what we could be. With science in hand, we forge ahead through the cosmic paths that we now tread. >> With talking wormhole stargates, cosmos and start destiny. 747, [music] where did it go? Boeing 747 through a wormhole flow. From the fields [music] to the stars, we break the chains. Understanding the universe, we make the gains. Lil Houla Chrome shines, bringing truth to light. Through his music, [music] we'll explore the night. With wormholes and stargates, our path is clear. Exploring the cosmos, our future's [music] here.