Negative Mass Propulsion and Cherenkov Radiation

Video Transcript

# Negative Mass Propulsion and Cherenkov Radiation Carl Sean could not have predicted 2021, but he did see it coming. He wrote the following back in 1995, and we quote, "I have a forboating of an America in my children's or grandchildren's time. When the United States is a service and information economy. When nearly all the manufacturing industries [music] have slipped away to other countries. When awesome technological powers are in the hands of a very few [music] and no one representing the public interest can even grasp the issues. When the people have lost the ability to set their own agendas or knowledgeably question those in authority. [music] When clutching our crystals and nervously consulting our horoscopes, our critical faculties in decline. [music] Unable to distinguish between what feels good and what's true, we slide almost without noticing [music] back into superstition and darkness. The dumbing down of America is most evident in the slow decay [music] of substantive content and the enormously influential media. The 30-second sound bites now [music] down to 10 seconds or less. lowest common denominator programming, credulous presentations on pseudocience [music] and superstition, but especially a kind of celebration of ignorance. Roll that around for a while. [music] Those were among his final published words. He died 10 months later. Here we are 25 years later realizing just [music] what he was trying to tell us back then. Malaysian 370 contact switch 120 decimal 97. >> Breaking news tonight. A Malaysia Airlines flight with 239 people on board, including four Americans, has gone missing. [music] Oh, [music] [music] [music] I remembered the line from the Hindu [music] scripture, the Bhagavad Gita, Vishnu. >> [music] >> is trying to persuade the prince that he should do his [music] duty and to impress him. Takes on his multi-armed form [music] and says, "Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds." [music] Welcome. We're doing it, chat. Welcome to the live stream, guys. I played the wrong intro. I have a brand new intro to play. It's pretty much the same as the last one, but it has another piece to it. Next time, guys, Friday, the new intro. Okay, guys. First of all, what the hell? What was that that I just saw in my intro a second ago? What is this? What is this? Pause. Pause. Uh, [music] hey. Uh, this guy looks familiar, huh? Interesting. Who is that? Uh, what's going on here? I'm seeing double, chat. I'm seeing double. So, no, I did not sell out my likeness to whatever this is. But I think I might need to find a mystical tree. I'm not sure what I'm supposed to get out of this. Anyway, it's pretty weird. Thank you guys for being here tonight. I appreciate it. Yes, some jacked guy. I saw it. Okay, I'll give it to you guys. Here you go. >> Ashton Forbes, you know that the super jacked guy. >> Yes, tonight we're doing what we always talk about, guys. We're talking about portals. >> I'm looking for portals. >> We're looking for portals, chat. So, tonight, negative mass propulsion and Cheron cough radiation. But before we get into the physics, before we get into all of that, let's let's loosen up a little bit. Let's have a little fun with our CIA buddies. There have been some amazing clips of John, what is he how is he pronounced his last name? Kiraau. I don't know, something [snorts] like that. Amazing clips of this guy being edited right now, which deserve to go viral. So, we're going to do our sworn duty as memers to help make those videos go viral and watch them and laugh along to them. And we won't even have to lie about it. So, here we go. Uh, let's go with this one. [clears throat] [snorts] By the way, this guy knows probably about I mean I don't think he knows about the operation of MH370, but like [snorts] I reached out to John to ask him to to talk and and what he knows about MH370 and heard nothing back. Maybe just random, you know, probably not monitoring social media, but this is a guy that's been I I think he's actually looking for a pardon because he blew the whistle on the CIA and they're trying to throw him in prison forever. So anyway, here we go. >> No fancy meeting you here at this cop show. I come here all the time. Do you? >> Whoa, whoa, whoa. That was way too fast. Hold up. Oh, okay. No, we have to slow this down. >> Oh, fancy meeting you here at this coffee shop. I come here all the time. Do you? Yeah, he says. I come here all the time. Why don't you have [music] a seat? He says. So, I sit down. At the end of the conversation, I go back to the embassy. I read a cable and I said, "He's [music] gay." I'm 100% sure he's gay. >> So, then we started this conversation, headquarters and I, how can we use that to our benefit? Did he have a wife? >> No. He was unusual. at his age. [music] I didn't know he was gay. >> Oh, I >> I just It was a vibe. >> So, headquarter says, >> "We want you to pretend that you're gay." >> I said, "Oh, come on, you guys. No, we really need the information. You got to pretend that you're gay." I said, "Okay, I'll do it." >> I'll do it for Uncle Sam. >> No fancy meeting you here at this cop shop. I come here all the time. >> What? What? It's like, how do you know he was gay? is a vibe. It is just a vibe. Is I Why don't you go pretend to be gay? We need you to pretend to be gay. I'll do it. I'll do it for Uncle Sam. Holy [ __ ] chat. Oh, man. The CIA might be in a much worse position than I thought. And if you are sitting here wondering, "What the hell did I just watch?" You literally watched an ex CIA officer who blew the whistle on the CIA and he's been going around on podcast for the last 10 years just saying all the crazy weird [ __ ] they do like go be gay for Uncle Sam. And if you thought that was all I'm sorry that's not even there's like a dozen of these clips like this. So here's another one. I like the caption even what is the CIA even about at this point? Like [laughter] I just lose it, man. And by the way, this is exactly my humor. Here you go. >> And there was a woman [music] in this foreign intelligence service who was >> the ugliest woman I've ever seen in my life. [music] >> Like you want to avert your eyes like she came off the >> side of Notraam. She was a, you know, a stone gargoyle with a giant mole right here with a giant hair coming out of it. >> That kind of ugly. So I asked her just to meet me privately for [music] lunch on Saturday. Don't tell anybody. And she agreed. And I was like, oh my god. She said yes. And I ran back to the office. I was like, she said yes to a lunch on Saturday alone. And my boss says, okay, here's what I want you to do. >> I want you to [ __ ] her. And I said, what? I said, have you ever seen her? And he said, I know, but we're the good guys. and you're going to have to take one for the team. And I go, "Oh [music] my god." I said, >> I go, "Okay, I'll do it." And there was >> What? You got to take one for the team, John. John, we we got a fatty, John. We got a fatty is released. We need you to wrangle this hog for the team, John. Okay, I'll do it for Uncle Sam. I'll do it for Uncle Sam. This is I don't know. It's even somehow crazier than even the movies. It's actually even crazier than movie. This isn't even all. There's one more, too. That one. Those two are just absolutely wild, though. Like, what in the hell, man? And [snorts] then this other one just like, dude, what is wrong with this guy, chat? What is this guy on? >> We got into an argument and I called him a racist. which you was. >> He was so angry. His face got all red. He clenched his teeth and he balls up his fists, right? And I thought to myself, "Ah, I went too far." And I put up my hands to protect myself cuz I thought, "Here it comes. And he's going to knock me out." This is how strong and tough he was. I put up my hands and he goes, >> "My penis is bigger than yours." And I said, "What?" And he goes, "My penis is bigger than yours." >> And I said, "You know what? You're nuts." And I quit. And I walked out and I quit. We got into an argument. What, Chad? What the There's just no context that can make any sense for that to be normal at all. I called him a racist, which he was. Then I was expecting him to beat the crap out of me. And instead, he told me, "My penis is bigger than yours." I got I got to hear that one one more time. [clears throat] >> We got into an argument and I called him a racist, >> which he was. He was so angry. His face got all red. He clenched his teeth and he balls up his fists, right? And I thought to myself, "Ah, I went too far." And I put up my hands to protect myself cuz I thought, "Here it comes. And he's going to knock me out." This is how strong and tough he was. I put up my hands and he goes, "My penis is bigger than yours." And I said, "What?" And he goes, "My penis is bigger than yours." >> And I said, "You know what? You're nuts." And I quit. And I walked out and I quit. >> [clears throat] >> The people that are saying, "Is this AI?" I wish, chat. I wish it was AI. I actually wish. In fact, I'm I don't know how many drugs you have to be on for that to make sense, but I imagine it's a lot. In fact, this reminds me, we have the uh the Reefer Madness is back. By the way, I don't know if you guys have been checking out social media, but everybody now is 100% against marijuana. They're saying it it makes you crazy, turns you into a schizophrenic, makes you beat up your wife, all kinds of crazy [ __ ] Chat. Wow. Wow. We're bringing it back. Okay, that's fine. Y'all know me. I've always said never inject too many marijah. If [snorts] you do, it will give you psychosis. It will make you go crazy. This is just This is just science. Just normal science, chat. So, here you go. It's because some of you have not been listening to this dare to keep off of drugs message that I've been telling you. Now, you will have to you will be forced to watch this educational video about the dangers of the marriage of hoochas. So, here you go guys. This is your punishment. Enjoy. >> Smoking the soul destroying reapfer, they find a moment's pleasure, but at a terrible price. divorcery, violence, murder, [music] suicide, [music] and the ultimate end of the marijuana addict. [music] Hopeless insanity. [music] >> [clears throat] >> Play faster. Play faster. [laughter] I don't Are they thinking that marijuana is like cocaine here in this scenario? I really can't I can't tell the vibe they're going for in this. By the way, that's a real movie. That's a 100% real movie. None of that's AI somehow magically, if you can believe it. That's actually not AI. I just want to watch the last part again cuz this guy's my favorite. I don't know who this guy is, but I just kind of want to watch this movie and see what this is all about now. And why is this woman like just straight up like hypers smoking this uh joint while she's playing piano? Like this does him saying that she's got to play faster also means she has to smoke faster, too. It's also over the top. Hold. Here we go. [music] >> And the ultimate end of the marijuana addict. hopeless [music] insanity. I love it, chat. Oh man, this is great. I hope we bring this back. I kind [clears throat] of want to just be anti-marijuana now just so I can be part of the satanic panic. Seems like fun. Okay, let's get real talk though, by the way. Real talk, chat. Nobody's going crazy for marijuana or whatever stupid [ __ ] people are saying. It's probably just crazy. People are already going crazy. There's already I mean, there's enough nut jobs in this world already. We don't really need more explanations for why, you know. I I can't blame anyone for going crazy in this world. So, let's lighten the lighten the mood here, guys. We're uh sharing fun videos today. Here's another one. Shout out to ZPE Disclosure. We haven't said his name recently. Shout out to you, ZPE Disclosure. His meme game is on point. Here it is. Get ready for it. Alex Jones, chill out. Alex Jones explaining the physicist to Patrick Bat David. Here he is. He's in the chat. >> Here we go. Get ready. >> Patriot. Patriot. Vampire. [clears throat] Nationalist. Mental mental [ __ ] Eugenesis. A scared man. Really [ __ ] >> [ __ ] >> [ __ ] >> [ __ ] Traitor. Vampire. Next level. Moses. >> Moses. >> Patriot. Patriot. Vampire. Nationalist. >> Mental. Mental. [ __ ] Eugenicist. >> A scared man. >> Really? [ __ ] [ __ ] >> Traitor. Vampire. >> That. Okay. >> Next level. Moses. >> Moses. And there's Paul Sizz at the end whose last name I still don't know how to pronounce. Hopefully it's Sizz. Hopefully we're not uh getting it wrong. One more two more actually two more three more videos we got to share here. We got a lot of stuff here before we get into it. Let's go. Let's start with this. [clears throat] Some people tell me they say, "Ashen, magic isn't real." And I say, "Witchcraft is definitely real." Absolutely. If you disbelieve, I will show you proof right here. Chat, are these dresses a different color? You would say, Ashton, there's no doubt the one on the left is black and blue. The one on the right is gold and yellow. How sure are you about that, chat? [snorts] How sure? Watch this. [clears throat] Okay. You You sure? Are you chat? [snorts] You sure that those dresses are a different color, huh? Okay. Okay. [snorts] So, here we go. This is uh MS Paint, right? [snorts] This is MS Paint. What I'm going to do here is I'm going to make two blocks that are all black. filled in black, solid black. [snorts] And I'm just going to mark half of it like that. And I'm going to mark half of it like that. [snorts] [sighs and gasps] Okay. I don't know what I was going to show, but somehow those are the same thing. There you go. If you cover it up, I was hoping if I covered it up it would look different to they would look the same to me, but they still look different to me for some reason. So, I don't know. There's some way to do this where like you can get it. Hold on. Let me try again. Some kind of weird optical illusion. Okay, I guess this isn't going to work the way I thought it was going to work. [laughter] It worked earlier today. Oh, yeah. Now it's working for me, chat. It's working for me, chat. I think it's like each person's mind. And like now I'm seeing them both exactly the same now. There we go. I don't know if they're working for you, but it works for me. If it doesn't work for you, that's your fault. [snorts] There you go. Those two are the same same dress chat. Optical illusions. Why am I bringing up something stupid like this? Because what we've learned from wormhole technology is that it's really like an optical illusion. The magnetic wormhole is tunneling between these points. But really from the perspective of the the the people going through the wormhole, time is moving normally for them. This is the most common question I get. What would it feel like if you went through a wormhole? If you were moving faster than the speed of light and the answer is like people say, you can't move faster than the speed of light. From your frame of reference, you can't do that. So the best you can do, the best we can do is move the medium. Which means that from the people that are in the wormhole, they don't even feel like they're moving. They feel like they're moving whatever they were moving before. If it's an airplane, they were moving in the airplane. They feel like they're moving on the airplane still. The thing is from the outside perspective, from the people watching them, our perspective looks like those people are moving faster than the speed of light. Now how is this possible? How do we explain this? We use Alubi's warp drive metric who in 1994 came out and said warp drives we can manipulate the medium and create gravitational waves a negative potential in front of us and a positive one behind us. And this will create a wave that we can just ride this wave. That was the idea of the warp drive. And to do that we require negative energy or negative mass. So for this challenge we need to learn what is negative mass, what is negative energy. This is the first topic for tonight. So let me pull up this. First of all, here is us understanding visually negative mass. This video is currently going viral. >> Let's see what happens in an inelast. >> Yes, here we go. And these are inelastic collisions. Uh uh I'll just show the whole video. Here we go. Let's see what happens in an inelastic collision where one of the blocks has a negative mass. We still aren't worrying about forces at this point. We're just assuming that the blocks can stick together without any trouble. In this setup, when the big block hits a positive mass target, it slows down. But when it hits a negative mass target, it speeds up. Why? Because the combined mass is smaller than the big block alone. So for momentum to be conserved, it has to move faster. If the two masses are close to being equal and opposite, the combined mass is very small and they move very fast. And if they're exactly equal and opposite, boom boom. My favorite part about this video is the end because I didn't even edit that in there. That's from the the video that I edited took that clip from. They have a nuclear thing at the end. So people when watching that may say, "How do I understand that?" So you take a big mass rock and you run it into a small rock and they're both going to move forward but slower than they were moving than the big rock was moving. Okay, easy. But when you take a negative when you have a positive mass bump into a negative mass, it doesn't slow down the resulting collision. It speeds it up because you simply do the math. F= ma. And you say, okay, well now my mass is being reduced. So if it's F= ma, then it's A= F / M. So if M gets smaller, then A goes up. Acceleration goes up as mass goes down. All you're doing is taking our equations for force and you are reducing the mass from it. Now, what's interesting is when you get close to them being equal, when you get close to them being equal, because imagine now that they're not colliding, imagine our positive mass and our negative mass get very close together. What's going to happen? This is the part that really blows people's minds. A lot of people would say your positive mass and your negative mass should come together. But that's not what happens. The positive mass is attracted to the negative mass and the negative mass is repelled from the positive mass. Hopefully I'm not saying this backwards. It's either this or it's backwards, but either way, same idea. And what this means is as the positive mass gets closer to the negative mass, the negative mass is going to pull away from it. And so what you see is this type of effect as they try to get closer, you see acceleration. You see free acceleration. Because if you could set up a system now where you have a positive mass and an equal negative mass, the positive mass is going to chase the negative mass and the negative mass is going to run away from the positive mass. So now you've just created an infinite acceleration system. You've created infinite acceleration system from doing that. And what happens as we approach them both being equal? Positive five mass, negative five mass. As they collide or get close, we get near infinite acceleration. If we were just to do the math, and as they get closer, acceleration just starts to skyrocket. That's effectively teleportation because the moment the acceleration goes beyond the light barrier teleportation from anyone looking at it, it would look like you just instantly went from one location to the next cuz you went faster than light. H. So the idea of negative mass is a a lot of people just don't even understand how negative mass interacts with positive mass because that idea that I just explained to you the positive mass chasing the negative mass or vice versa that is the basis for a warp drive. That is what warp drive is. And now the question is well what is the positive mass and what is the negative mass to [snorts] these questions we are going to go to the dursum we're going to the ders chat okay if you don't know what the durs are the defense intelligence reference documents the most important scientific papers in human history in human history not yet known but it will be in the future will be in the future. Here it is. Negative mass propulsion right here. Now instead of reading through all of this and boring you all to death, I had Grock do a little summary of the main points and I think there's a couple slides that I can read through that will also bring the point home. But negative mass propulsion, first thing this paper does is explain what I already told you. So, let me go through what I set up at Grock real quick. Um, where is it? Here. Okay, here we go. Negative mass propulsion. Switch this. We'll come back to that. And if you need that, guys, that's on the archive uh whatever uh internet archive. Yeah, internetive.org. Okay, here you guys go. The talking points for our negative mass propulsion interpretation of the direct equation as evidence for negative masses. So the first thing is how do we prove that there are negative masses that they can even exist from a conceptual physics perspective. Number one, Winterberg argues draws on Schrodinger's analysis of the Draq equation, arguing that and the equation's negative energy solutions imply that there must be negative masses. Now, where are they? They must be hidden behind the positive masses. So, here is Friedwart Winterberg. He's the one that wrote this dur. He's the one who wrote the nuclear weapons uh textbook thermonuclear weapon principles of thermonuclear detonations that I that I read that we've talked about several times. His principle is this. The electron itself is not just a negative charge. It's actually a positive mass and a negative mass that are locked into a geometry spinning around. And this positive mass and negative mass an angular momentum forms from them. And what this causes is what we call quantum spin. And that what this means is that what we think of as an electron is actually two parts mixed together in a like binary system. Maybe even more than two, but the idea is the simplest version two. So that's what Freyart Winterberg says. And what he thinks then is if this is the case, maybe there's a way to disconnect the negative mass component of the electron from the positive mass component. And yes, JK Philly says this is what procession is when it comes to spin. So what we see Friedart Winterberg doing in this paper is he's doing something very similar to what Ferris Williams is doing. He's saying I'm going to look from the ground up the fundamentals of physics and I'm going to say how much do we really know and how much have we assumed and what other interpretations are there. Now, my opinion of Fryart Winterberg's uh analysis and concept, conceptual view is I think he's a little off, but I still think it's mostly there. And this is what I tell people in terms of like we're not, you know, perfect is the enemy of good. It's good enough. He's got the broad strokes down in my opinion. So he says this negative mass is hidden in the electron and the electron's zitraong which we've heard before the trembling motion the vibration is explained as an oscillation between the positive and negative masses. The DRA equation where we have our wave function h uh oh so this is the key equation sorry the significance is this pro this provides the quantum mechanical foundation for negative mass which is crucial for propulsion concepts like all could bei now he says that negative masses could be trapped in gravitational wells so this is where I was explaining to you negative masses which are repelled by positive mass gravitational fields would naturally migrate to the centers of celestial bodies. This is another claim that I thought was pretty wild that I'm not sure I agree with, but Friedart Winterberg thinks that there is a negative mass concentration at the center of planets and maybe even at the center of the moon. And so he even argued that if we were looking for a a concentration of negative mass because it's repelled by or repelled from positive mass, it's going to be in the center of the planet. It's going to be in the center. And actually what he wants to do is drill a hole through the moon to get to the middle where then we could basically mine the negative mass, which if he's right, that'd be pretty crazy. But I for some reason it doesn't seem realistic to me. But I mean yeah really any part of it but you get the point. So this now says and this is like almost a little too good to be true because like he says here this would now say that negative mass goes from this exotic substance. Now something you can literally just mine mine it like you're mining helium 3 on the moon. Now, if this is true, hypothetically, if this is true, this means that what Elon is doing on the moon definitely has another purpose there. Why are we building a moon base? If you've been living on a rock, Elon gave up on Mars and now he's talking about building a elaborate moon base. Why? For what? There's nothing up there we need, man. We don't even really need the helium 3 anymore. But if there is a whole bunch of negative mass in the center of the of the moon and it's a super rare resource like unoptanium level, it wouldn't make sense. So if I end up being wrong about Elon, he's not an NPC, then why then I'm even more impressed. Okay. Uh don't care about mining on the moon. We get the point. Um don't care about extracting it. Let's we'll we'll go past that. applications for self accelerating propulsion. Once extracted, equal positive and negative masses can be paired. Remember what I just told you guys. How crazy is this? By the way, I hadn't read these points before. I just told the AI to go do it. I was reading the paper instead. Right there is exactly what I told you when I showed you the video five minutes ago, 10 minutes ago. Right there. The point is when you have equal positive and negative masses, that's where you can get extremely high acceleration. Just like when we plopped our positive and negative masses together, instantly disappears. So this is what Fryart Winterberg is saying here is that the key to getting warp drive to work is getting your positive and negative masses to being close to equal. It's not that you want a huge amount of negative mass. You want an equal amount of positive and negative mass to reach the maximum amount of acceleration. Pretty neat. The negative mass repels the I was right. I didn't say it backwards, chat. The negative mass repels the positive. But due to inverted inertia, the system accelerates uniformly in one direction without expending energy, violating conservation laws apparently, but consistent with general relativity. So this is the rub. This is the rub that makes it look like it's breaking physics, but it's not because it's consistent with general relativity. And then uh oh, it didn't even do the thing that I wanted to point. Okay, we're going to go back and look at the paper in a second. Um, let's go to here. What I wanted to show you is this page specifically. Where is it? I think it's page 13. Where is it? Where are you at? There's the Zitriugong uh phenomenon as the manifestation for negative masses. So So is that what I wanted to look at? I think it was. Well, that's not it. Where is it? Sorry, guys. Hang on. It's here somewhere. Where's I want the Aaronhoff bomb effect one somewhere. It's in here. There it is. Negative mass interpretation of the Aaron Hoff bomb effect. How do I make this like read read version like that? Okay. So what he's saying here is that you can actually figure out that negative mass must exist from the Aaronhoff bomb effect. So he takes the Aronhoff bomb effect and he shows there must be this scalar potential because of the Aeronhoff bomb effect. Um what was the key thing that I wanted him that he says in here? So he says in the hydrodnamic interpretation suggested by the plank ether hypothesis the phase shift caused by either the magnetic or gravitational vector potential result from a circular flow of the plank ether. The principle of equivalence can precisely relate this circular flow to the angular velocity of a rotating platform. Now one has the gra one has for the gravitational vector potential this equation now here. So what he's saying here interestingly is that oh I'm not sharing the right thing. My bad fam no one no one told me. What he's saying here is that we have we can explain this negative energy as the potentials that we are unable to measure when we look at the Aaronhoff bomb effect. When we looked at the Aaronov bomb effect, we said what we found was it it's not the fields that are causing the action because in the absence of fields we still see the action. So what this would mean, it's the potentials that cause the action, not the fields that cause the action. And so Winterberg here is evoking an extra dimension to explain this phenomenon using the plank ether. And he's saying this is the source of the negative energy. How do we get negative energy? Well, we have these potentials. Let's tap into the potentials and we can get our negative energy. So to me this interpretation is exactly what I have been telling you all which is this idea that we have this sea of energy around us and the negative energy is tapping into that. how you visualize tapping into this sea of energy. Probably slightly different from physicist to physicist. Thought there was something else he said down here. Um what was the concluding thoughts? One sees that inside the coil velocity profiles the same as in a rotating frame of reference having outside the coil form a potential vortex. And so what they're taking here is they're taking general relativity and they're saying take your frames of reference and imagine what this would look like on this small scale. He's saying it's going to look like a vortex motion. Everything is going to be a vortex motion through the ether through an extra dimension. Okay. So he says the plank ether model can give a simple explanation. The plank ether consists of two superfluid components. One composed of positive plank masses and the other composed of negative plank masses. The two components can flow freely through each other making possible two configurations. One where both the components are correlate co-rotating and one where they are counterrotating. the co-rotating configuration realized on a rotating platform where it leads to the sagnetic effect and neutron interference effects says this suggests that the presence of the magnetic vector potential [clears throat] and and oh the the the presence of the magnetic vector potential the two superfluid components are counterrotating outside the coil where the curl is equal to zero the magnetic energy density vanishes is implying that the magnitude of both the velocities are exactly the same. Okay, so I thought there was something else I wanted to look at on this, but let's just skip ahead to the next part that I wanted to discuss. [clears throat] [snorts] Okay, where is my link here? Here it is. This idea of this plank ether where we have our positive and negative masses connected together is directly analogist to the DRA C. The DRA C is another conceptual view of the zero point energy. And in this paper, let me read this direct quote. Oh yeah, this is the quote that I wanted. I almost forgot. Thank goodness I just remembered it. It was on one of these pages that I just read here, but I think I I quoted it on my um [snorts] my Twitter. One sec. Here it is. Um, special relativity is a consequence of quantum mechanics leading to the 0 point vacuum energy and can be interpreted as saying that the 0 point vacuum energy generates spaceime. That's a direct quote from Friedwart Winterberg in that paper that I just showed you was on one of the previous SL uh pages that I skipped past. Special relativity is a consequence of quantum mechanics which leads to 0 point energy existing and this can be interpreted as the 0 point energy generating spaceime aka the 0 point energy is the spaceime all around us. Now this would mean if fry winterberg is correct. This means that there Dra was right that there really is this direct sea of energy. And so Dra would say there are these holes and what you can think about it like positive and minus is that we have these electron holes and you can pull this energy out of this DRA C of this zero point energy and it turns into real energy. leaves behind a hole behind. And this is how we maintain symmetry. Everything you pull out, how is conservation being maintained? Because there's a counterpart where you just yanked it out of this ocean that exists. And eventually it will go back to that ocean. That is how that part's possible. Now, this brings up a post that I saw that I wanted to dig into here. Somebody asked a very interesting question to Grock. Let me show you this. Um, is this going to let me go back? Hopefully. [clears throat] They said design a direct C generator. And I thought, what the hell is that? What does that even mean? I understand the idea of the Direct C, but what is a Direct C generator? And why would Grock respond back and say, "I'm sorry, I can't assist with designing a DRA C devices that involves restricted subject matter." Okay, now I'm really interested because we've pretty much shown that there must be an extra dimension. Friedwart Winterberg is writing papers about the plank ether hypothesis and how we can do negative mass propulsion with this. And now here, this links directly to the Drax Sea, the idea of the Drax Sea. and Grock won't answer this. Well, you guys know that we found a workaround already. That's what I was showing you guys right here. So, somebody several people were pretty easily able to get it to write one. Let's just I just want to read this. It's very short. It's only a couple pages. Let me just read this for you guys. The DRA C is a fascinating but outdated theoretical concept from quantum mechanics proposed by Paul Drack in the 1930s to explain the existence of posetrons antimatter electrons the opposite of an electron and resolve issues with negative energy solutions in his relativistic wave equation. So they took Dra's wave equation as was just mentioned that that Fert Wterberg mentioned and in his wave equation there's negative energy solutions. It can be positive or minus. So people are going, "Wait a minute. Negative energy must exist because Paul Dur's equations have a negative energy solution. Either is possible." So from the math, it definitely must exist. And so people have been co uh puffing copium and what have you to deny negative energy and call it exotic matter and other stupid [ __ ] Doesn't say that in here. That's just me. It imagines the vacuum as an infinite sea of filled negative energy electron states. Well, there you go. There you go, chat. If you want to know what the negative energy is, Paul Drack just explained it. The direct C is an infinite sea of negative energy states. So, what does that mean, chat? If I need some negative energy, where am I going? Oh, the direct sea. because it's filled with negative energy. But in my conceptual view, it's just normal energy. We just have to pull it out. It's just trapped in the ether. It's trapped. If we yank that out, then it would become positive energy. This is the idea of the dra hole in my opinion. Here you go. So modern quantum mechanics uh modern quantum quantum field theory has largely superseded this with more elegant descriptions involving particle anti-particle creation. Now this is real interesting. I don't think I knew this. The evolution of this theory is what? The virtual particle pairs. The swinger limit. The Schwinger limit is the same as this. Yes. Remember in current physics theory, we think that the the the vacuum is filled with particle anti-particle pairs that are annihilating all the time. That's the same idea as the direct C. It's just taking it to a different direction. So what that means is the Schwinger limit is the equivalent of tapping into the DRA C because the DRA C is the virtual particle pairs. Wow. Okay. This is why I love just learning physics because you're like wait this is just a pretty normal thing. Anyone can understand that. But we're just not taught that. And we and they change the wording around to make everything really confusing for us. So, since a real DRA C generator doesn't exist, we're going to make a fake one up. This device will tap in or simulate the DRA C by manipulating vacuum energy states to generate exotic effects such as creating a temporally particle antiparticle pairs or extracting negative energy for hypothetical applications. Well, chat, you had my attent. You had my curiosity, but now you have my attention because this is pretty much saying, hey, there is a zero point energy and we can tap into that energy. Turns out a direct C generator is a free energy device. It's something that's tapping in to the zero point energy. And what this means is you're going to be able to get free energy. You're going to be able to get warp drives and wormholes. Let's let it keep going. So, we have a vacuum chamber core. Sure. So, we've got to create a vacuum chamber quantum field extractor. An array of laser emitters uh tuned to phentoc pulses at wavelengths corresponding to electron rest energy. These would agitate the vacuum promoting electrons from negative to positive energy states creating virtual pairs. Holy [ __ ] chat. Femtoc lasers the thing that Salvatore Py was saying that we need for vacuum effects. All of Sal's interviews, everything he's talking about ftoc lasers. Here's Grock saying, "Yeah, you need ftoc lasers and you tune the frequency to a harmonic resonant frequency to the ground state of the electron. And if you do that, you can force them to come out." That sounds like a workaround to the swinger limit to me. That sounds like a workaround to the Schwinger limit to me. Maybe I'm off. Negative energy extractor, a fictional casmir effect amplifier. So, we could do a Caseasmir effect amplifier. Sure, we're just going to skip that cuz, you know, we don't know if that's even real. Entangled cubid arrays. And then power source. This is what really starts sending me a microfusion reactor or 0 point energy tap. Ironic since that's what we're trying to generate energy requirements equivalent to a small stars output. Oh [ __ ] chat. Oh [ __ ] This is basically saying if you want to tap into the zero point energy, you need something that's already tapping into the zero point energy. You already need a fusion reactor if you want to make a wormhole, which is blowing my mind because we're watching three fusion reactors spinning around MH370, zapping it into a wormhole. How dare you hate on my hair? By btw, I've got a haircut. Appointment set up for tomorrow. We're just rolling with it. If you don't like it, too bad. Anyway, that was freaky to me because this also connects to the idea that fusion is a zero point energy tap. Fusion is a zero point energy tap. Even Grock thinks so. Grock is saying if this is real, fusion has to be tapping into zero point energy. There's no way it can't be. It has to be. Wow. Now, that's not even the part I wanted to get at the operational flow. Forget the numbers here. Although, I do have to point out it does look like we're literally solving for the Schrodinger equation here. If you're solving for Durac's equation, I'm pretty sure you're solving the Schroinger equation, which is what Tom Bearden said they figured out. He said it straight up in the 80s. They figured out how to solve the Schroinger equation. They figure out the wave function. This part harvesting detect pair production via Sharon Coffl like radiation. What? What? So if pair production is happening, we should see Cherov radiation occurring. You might say, Ashton, what the hell is Cherov radiation? What does that mean? What is that? Let's go ahead and take a look. Let's take a look for ourselves. Oh, before we take before we look at this, take a look at this. What would the applications be? Free energy, infinite energy source, faster than light travel. A weaponized version would be a sea drain that creates a local antimatter burst. But that's ethically dubious. What the hell does ethically dubious mean? Yeah. Um, hitting someone with an antimatter bomb. It's not It's not dubious. It's not ethically dubious. It's ethically just straight up wrong. By the way, if you have to know, don't ever hit anybody with an antimatter bomb. It's It's considered bad. It's considered a faux paw to hit somebody with an antimatter bomb. Anyway, the next topic and a relevant one is Cherov radiation because we've heard about this idea of Cherankov radiation from fusion reactors. It's a common thing in nuclear physics and I want to understand what it is because maybe we're seeing Sharonov radiation in the MH370 videos. Let me show you what I mean before we take a look at what Sharonov radiation is. This is a slowed down version of the MH370 videos that has been uh color changed into black and blue for the purpose of you being able to see the dark lines that are coming out of the orbs. And in this version, you can see extremely clearly that there are dark lines both behind the orbs and in front of them. And the question everybody had when this video first started making the rounds is what the hell is that? Why are there these black lines coming out of the orbs? And why are they in front of the orbs? So when we look at these lines of orbs, what do we what do we see in these lines? A, they're black. So, they're either cold or they are outside of the spectrum that the camera is catching. Look how long this line is. Look how long that black line is. That line is really long right here. But earlier when we were looking at spin around the plane, the line in front of the orb doesn't look that long. It's kind of long. So, you can see these lines. You can see they also dissipate. They seem to kind of dissipate after a few seconds. like they're there even when the orb passes by, but it's still it like goes away. It kind of fades. So, we can learn a little bit about it. Now, I'm going to play it. Let this play out because you can't see the lines. I mean, you can see it really clearly right here. Look at those huge lines. Now, watch this. After the plane disappears, the lines are still there. And who Why are you spoiling the answers? tooidal Sheronov radiation. Bingo. Bingo. We're looking at Sharonov radiation coming out of these orbs, chat. And that means those orbs are fusion reactors. They're they're particle accelerators. Look how long the Look how long the black line is right here. Look how long these black lines are all of a sudden. It's so long. It's crazy how Look how long that [ __ ] is. It's like longer than the plane now. You see those black lines in front of them? And then watch this. After the plane disappears, the black line is still there. You see that black line still there? Right kind of right here. Maybe that's just part of the cloud. Hard to say. [clears throat] So, are you ready for this? How are we going to find out if that's Cherov radiation? Well, [snorts] let's watch a video. Wait, where's my Cherov radiation video? Here it is. Okay. Whoops, that's not the right one. Here we go. So, this video is by Fermy Lab. I guess I'll give him a subscribe just to, you know, maybe we won't get copyright strike if I do that. Okay, here we go. Firmeny Lab, hit me up. Tell us about Churn Cherov radiation. >> Well, if you think that this will lead to something like this, >> engage, >> you'll be disappointed. Sorry about that. >> Um, I'm going to go ahead and say he's wrong. He's saying already that this is not going to lead to warp drives. Well, I'm just going to go ahead and say I've got two videos that tell a different story. Tell a completely different story. But you know what? Go ahead, Mr. Science Guy. Tell us about the Cherankov radiation. I made an entire video on the special cases, which you might want to look up. In this cheat, of course, but it's still pretty interesting. So, let's talk about it. When we talk about the speed of light, we really mean the speed of light in a vacuum. When light encounters a transparent medium like glass, plastic, water, or even air, it slows down. You may have heard of this if you ever took an introductory physics class. The phenomenon is called the index of refraction. And we know that in glass and plastic, light travels at about 2/3 the speed that light travels in a vacuum. In water, it's about 3/4. And in air, okay, so right off the bat, wow. His first thing when we we're g first to explain Sharon cough radiation the first thing he says is you need to realize space is a medium the speed of light is only constant in the vacuum it can be slowed down in materials like water like air like anything this is huge because what have we been teaching we've been teaching this 0 point energy of spacetime is a medium where you can change that refractive index the very refractive index he's talking about right here in this video. In fact, I use the exact same example of the water cup and the straw that he's using right there. The speed is only a tiny tiny tiny bit slowed down. So, that's the trick. Suppose you had a vacuum with a light beam in it with an electrically charged particle like an electron or a proton traveling alongside it at very nearly the speed of light. Say 99.99% that speed or something. the two of them would stay together pretty much, although the photon would slowly pull ahead. Now, suppose that we shoot the two of them into a huge tank of water. If we did that, the electron would continue to travel at 99.99% the speed of light in the vacuum, while the light beam would instantly slow down to 75% its normal speed. In this situation, the electron would be traveling faster than light. Boom. Mind. >> Holy. Are you seeing it, chat? Holy [ __ ] I'm already seeing it. Are you seeing it? What is Cherov radiation? It's so obvious. The electrons are moving faster than light. The light is being slowed down, but the electrons don't get slowed down as much as the light gets slowed down. This means wherever you're seeing Sheronov radiation like this, you're looking at a particle accelerator. You're looking at either a particle accelerator or particle decelerator, however you want to think about it. You're looking at something that's quite literally manipulating the medium in which these reactions are occurring. This directly connects the idea of fusion breaking the Schwinger limit, the ether, everything together. Let's let him keep going because not only does this, in my opinion, tell us exactly what we're looking at. Exactly, JK. Free electron. Remember our free electron laser? Remember I said, what do we need for the orbs? We need a free electron laser. What does that look like right over there? Those look like free electrons that have broken away from the light. And how did we do it? We slowed the light down so the electrons would break free. This is why a free electron laser is going to emit X-rays. Let's keep going. Now the question is, now I'm going, okay, holy [ __ ] Those dark lines we're seeing, that's because we're seeing electrons flying out of this [ __ ] fusion reactor. faster than the light that's going through it because the light is getting slowed down in the fusion reactor. Then I'm going, okay, well, wait, wait, wait a minute. Is there more? Is can can we somehow connect this? Is there how's this going to look? How's this going to work? How's it going to operate? Please continue. Blown. So, having a particle travel faster than light is already a kind of cool thing, but it actually gets even better. The first person to notice that a liquid surrounding a radioactive substance glowed blue was Marie Cury because well, you know, Marie Cury, she was totally the bomb. But the person who typically chat boomers that are out there never say totally the bomb. Also, I'm seeing boomers on social media using like clavicle max pilling lingo. It's so cringe. Please do not do it. My when I did I I regret doing it now. I was trying to do it before it got all boomer cringe. Anyway, sorry. Sorry. >> He gets the credit for the first observation of the phenomenon is a Russian student by the name of Pavl Trinkov. He first saw it back in 1934. Now, before I tell you about the physics, I'd like to talk a little bit about >> She invented X-rays, too. She invented X-rays. Yeah. Okay. >> How to spell his name. >> Okay. We're going to skip this guy cuz I don't care about how he spell his name. >> What do I know? So, let's move on. When Churankov saw the blue light emanating from water surrounding a radioactive sample, he told his adviser Sergey Vavalov. Vavalov shared the observation with two of his colleagues, Igor Tam and Ilia Franc. And Tom and Frank figured out what was going on. It turns out that [clears throat and cough] prepare yourself, chat. MH370, we need like a hands. We need something like uh in the Hunger Games, right? Four orbs. You got to hold up the four orbs. The four orb signal chat. Whenever you need help, whenever you need those orbs to come teleport away a bad guy, you hold up the four orbs and help will come no matter where you are. Okay, here we go. Ready for this? When an electrically charged particle moves through a dialectric medium at a speed faster than light moves through that material, light is emitted and that light is called trinkov light. Now the exact detailed mechanism whereby light is emitted is quite complicated. Maybe I'll describe it in a future video but basically >> basically what he means is that we don't know how. It's like okay the electron is moving faster than the light is moving and this emits light and it emits light because whenever light hits an object it emits light which is also kind of a weird phenomenon in itself photoelectric effect but here we go the electron is moving faster than the medium and therefore it's going to emit light. Here we go. ically it's created because the electric field of the charged particle disrupts the electrons of distant atoms and those disruptions cause even more disruptions to other atoms. When you add up everything, trankov light is emitted, but only if the charged particle is traveling faster than light. If light is emitted at a point represented by this X here, it radiates from that point in a sphere. You can see how it works in this animation. The sphere grows at the speed of light. But the particle which is represented by this red dot is traveling faster than the speed of light. You can see that the dot moves away from the x faster than the sphere grows. Now suppose light is emitted when the particle is set [snorts] at a different location. >> Mhm. >> That light will also leave the point in a sphere and the sphere will also grow. This process so look at what we're looking at right here. The X and the sphere growing represents the light moving at light speed. So, as you can see, the sphere never is able to catch up to the red dot. The red dots are electron. So, no matter when the light's being emitted, it's always moving slower than the electron is moving. Got it? So, what this does, as you can see here, creates this wavefront. creates a wave front almost >> can appear again and again and again with a series of spheres. The edges of the spheres line up which you can see here and of course light isn't emitted just at these locations where the X's are marked. >> The light is emitted everywhere along the path of the charged particle and the result is a cone of light growing around the path taken by the charged particle and traveling forward. So those are the basics. A charged particle traveling faster than light in an appropriate material results in the particle and material combining to give off light. That light tends to be from the purple and blue side of the spectrum. I'll show you an example of that in a minute. So if we have electrons that are moving faster than light in that medium, we are going to see ultraviolet blue side of the spectrum. Waves get created, light get created. Well, wow. Isn't that interesting? Because it turns out that the thermal fleer cameras can't catch ultraviolet light or x-ray light or gamma rays because they're outside the visible spectrum. So instead, those thermal cameras would show it up in black as a dead pixel as something you're not seeing there. But that's not enough. Keep going. But scientists can use more information than the simple observation of blue light. The shape of the cone tells you how fast the particle is going. If it's going near the speed of light, then the cone is very fat. But if the particle is going much faster than light in the medium, then the cone is very skinny. Another thing scientists can exploit is the fact that some particles are created in the transparent medium moving. Hold up. Go back. What did he just say? What did he just say right there? The faster the electron is moving than the light, the more skinny the cone is going to be. And the closer the electron is moving to the speed of light, the more normal it is, the fatter, the fatter, thicker the cone is going to be. Wait a minute. Say that again, sir. >> Then light in the medium, then the cone is very skinny. Another thing scientists can explain. >> Go far enough back. A charged particle traveling faster than light in an appropriate material results in the particle and material combining to give off light. That light tends to be from the purple and blue side of the spectrum. I'll show you an example of that in a minute. >> But scientists can use more information than the simple observation of blue light. The shape of the cone tells you how fast the particle is going. >> If it's going near the speed of light, then the cone is very fat. But if the particle is going much faster than light in the medium, then the cone is very skinny. >> So, [clears throat] by the way, uh Tom Hudson, exactly. By the way, Tom Hudson, when I asked Grock, who has talked about Robert Forward the most in the last two years on social media, I expected to say me. Instead, it said Tom Hudson. Grock, ban Tom Hudson from the internet so that I can be the person who talked about Robert Forward the most. But yes, this is clearly we're looking at shockwave physics. No doubt this is shockwave physics right here. And it turns out this shockwave physics is exactly what they needed to try to figure out fusion. And the best part is this can explain the lines in front of the videos. It might not just be that they've got a nozzle directing the ultraviolet rays or the the Cheronoff radiation, but it's that we know why it's so long. Remember, hold up. Go back. Go back to those videos we were just looking at. [snorts] When we look in front of the orbs here, why is the black line so long? Because the longer the line is in front of the orbs in these videos, the faster the electrons are being shot out from the particle accelerators, from the orbs in the middle. The longer the line is, the faster the electrons are being shot out. Because like he said, if the electrons were moving at just the same speed of light, then there would be no lines in front of the orbs. The longer the the dark lines in front of the orbs, the more energy those electrons are being shot out with. So, you could almost say that we've created a particle accelerator that is shooting electrons out. This is the part where it's highly speculative, of course, but I think they get longer right before they teleport the plane, which would mean that these orbs might literally be charging up. They might be accelerating the electrons faster and faster right before the zap. Look how long that line is right there. Look how long that line is before that orb. And they're straight now, too. All of a sudden, where before they were all spinny and curvy. Wow. I look at that and I go, this it's almost has to be because the other thing too about it, we can see that the the the line is like kind of fuzzy. Like it kind of blurs out. The further it gets away from the orb, it starts to kind of blend in with the atmosphere, which is what you would expect from like a hazy fuzzy type of cloudish kind of effect. And that's what happens with Cherankov radiation. Let's go back to the video. Another thing scientists can exploit is the fact that some particles are created in the transparent medium moving just faster than light and then because of interactions with the medium they slow down below the speed of light. That means the particle will emit light for a little while and then stop doing so. And that means that the light will not be a cone forever. Instead, you'll see a gap between the two waveforms. Now, what I've shown you here is in two dimensions, but of course, it's a three-dimensional thing. The light comes out as a ring. This particular feature is very useful in huge trinkoff detectors. For instance, the super kamio exper. >> The light comes out as a ring. [snorts] Wait, what? Is there any way? We're too far away, I think, to tell. But that might explain why these lines in front of the orbs look so weird. Like, you can kind of see through it and you kind of can't. What if it's in some kind of either donut shape when it's coming out or even a vortex like a uh like a helictical uh shape like DNA as it's coming out? We can't really tell because it just looks like a line to us because we're so far away and it looks fuzzy, but that could actually be a toidal shape that it's producing in front of it. And again, look at it. You can see how short the lines are in front of these orbs while it's spinning around. But the moment they go to vertical formation, the lines are really long. And you can see, you can clearly see how they fade too. Like in right here, you can see how the line fades right there. Like it, you know, you can see the line in the top right screen coming into the screen, but then it kind of fades out just like Cheronov radiation would predict. And I do think it's helix lines as well. I think that's what it's producing because in threedimensional space, it's going to be a helix formation, not just a toid. So, let's go back to this. Um, actually, I think that might be it. >> In Japan, the nutrinos convert into electrons or muons, which are charged particles that can emit tranov light. That's basically how it works. Some of the nutrinos that interact in the water are low enough energy that electrons or muons don't travel very far. Therefore, the tranov light makes rings inside the detector. >> Using the size of the rings and the time the light arrives at detectors throughout the apparatus, scientists can figure out the energy and trajectory of the parent nutrino. Really a very cool technique. >> The only reason why I showed this last part is because he explains how they can use this as a nutrino detector. And I've always wondered, what is a nutrino? A nutrino could be an ether particle. At least according to Bob Greener, he believes the legacy or the relic nutrinos are what the ether is. So if that's true, if that's the case, then this actually starts to make sense. We're if that's the case, then we're using nutrino to explain ether. And this Cheronov radiation is a byproduct of us manipulating general relativity with electrons moving faster than the speed of light relatively relativistically because now you imagine you are the electron. Imagine you're the electron in that wavefront. You're moving faster than the light is behind you. That's an analogy to us being able to look at somebody who is warping through spaceime faster than the speed of light. the light would never be able to see that person because they're moving faster than the light is. Think about this from the physics perspective. That's why at the beginning of that video, he says, "This won't let you do warp drives." Yes, it will. Yes, it will. [laughter] I'm going to go ahead and say that guy was wrong at the beginning of that video because this is definitely the same physics as a warp drive. Same thing. Now, so the big takeaway, the big yatsi from the night is I think we're looking at Sharonov radiation. I think the durac explains that we need fusion reactors in order to make a wormhole. You actually need to understand the physics and use the physics to amplify the physics to make these huge quantum effects on the macroscopic level. This is why we have to use fusion reactors to make an actual wormhole. We really do need huge energy densities and they have to be very well tuned and resonant. H. Now, let's change gears a little bit here to something that's a little bit less worldending implications. And I just want to go to this interview that the Y files had earlier. Was this when was this? A couple days ago or something like this because I think this conversation they have right here is pretty interesting. We're just going to listen to this for like a minute here. I still don't I still can't wrap my head around how that leap happened so quickly. Is that part of another story? Yeah. Do you I can tell you [laughter] >> comp compress it. >> Okay, I'll comp I'll compress it as quick as >> because it just I can't get my like suddenly we can do this. >> The first six, eight, 10 times we tried just we just wanted to hit the moon with something. Nobody could hit it. The reason why was because when you have a rotating system in a spacecraft, it pulls energy in from the vacuum. Uh you got you know the typical phrase is zero point energy. Zero point energy is [ __ ] It's pulling energy from higher dimensions whereas [clears throat] >> zero point energy is not [ __ ] Please go back and repeat what you just said, good sir. >> Moon with something. Nobody could hit it. The reason why was because when you have a rotating system in a spacecraft, it pulls energy in from the vacuum. U you got, you know, the typical T phrase is zero point energy. Zero point energy is [ __ ] It's pulling energy from higher dimensions is where it's really >> zero point energy is [ __ ] >> Well, it's not it's not in it's not in a physical medium in in the threedimensional universe. >> Correct. Okay. That Well, that's a different way of expressing. >> It's pulling it from the ether, the hyperdimensional ether. >> Okay. >> Okay. So, that's but it's a subtle difference, but you can call it I just Yeah, it's a subtle difference. And this is what I This is exactly what I tell people. Why is this guy saying that 0 point energy is [ __ ] while he's literally explaining exactly what zero point energy is. This is why we can't get disclosure because we got people going out there who don't understand the concept apparently or they do and then they're saying it's [ __ ] but it's hyperdimensional. It's in this extra dimension. Yes, that's what we're saying. That's what zero point energy is. That's the whole point of why we need Ferris Williams 5D electromagnetic theory. We need an extra dimension because we clearly don't see the zero point energy. We can't even So yeah, we don't see the zero point energy. So we must have an it must be hidden somewhere in this extra dimension. I like zero point energy. The term is not exactly correct. It's hyperdimensional energy. >> So So unless I'm less angry at you. Okay. Okay. So, how does one bra figure this out? Well, again, first time we try to hit the moon, the Russians miss it by 37 38,000 mi. 18 times the moon's diameter. How do you miss the moon by that much? Second time they try it, um, missed by 4,000. Nobody can hit the freaking moon, right? Except we we're we're trying, the Russians are trying, we keep missing. Finally, on Ranger 4, we hit the moon. We hit it dead on. How did we hit it? >> All the electrical systems failed >> after they shot it at the moon. All of the rotating gyros inside the spacecraft go dead so it runs in a straight line. Okay. So, this is a crazy story. Is this real? Is that Can somebody fact check that story? I'm not going to be surprised if it's real cuz what he's saying here, this is it's actually very well known that not just NASA but Russia as well struggled with sending probes and stuff in space. We would miss. we would be inaccurate. And so we'd have to redo the calculation, figure out what went wrong. And if you if you have the normie NPC view of this, you would say, well, they just didn't understand, you know, something or other. That's we understand it now. But if you understand zero point energy, you realize you have to accommodate for the fact that space is a medium filled with energy. And if you're not accommodating for that, your shit's going to go way off course. And that's what he's saying there is that objects that are spinning are interacting with spaceime. And even if it's a very small interaction in the zero gravity of space, it adds up. Especially over long distances and time scales, it adds up a lot. And what this means is from our classic view of physics, we can think we're we're direct, you know, deadshot center, bullseyeing uh the moon and then we can miss completely. Miss completely. Imagine you're shooting a gun at a target and you're perfectly lined up and you just miss completely. You'd be like, "Uh, what what happened there? Was something in the way? What was going on? And that's pretty wild because then he says we were able to accidentally hit it. How did we accidentally hit it? Well, that was the time when all the electronics were turned off. So all the electromagnetic stuff going on in the device in the probe was no longer on, no longer interacting with the zero point energy. I find this idea very compelling, very very compelling because even smallcale effects as we've seen from the Kasmir effect can become macroscopic can actually move stuff around tell you this about Einstein but you know Albert space is not curved. Okay. What happens is is that when you have rotation, you pull energy from beyond the ether, right? And and that that affects the >> I love how you just casually just threw just it's not curved. Gravity is gravity [ __ ] also. >> No, gravity something. I don't know what. So, you know, and this guy's I think he's doing a good job. I would debate him on some of these points because I would say it is curved. I get what he means, but when you are extracting that energy, what are you actually doing? What's the physical principle that you're doing? I would argue that when you're extracting 0 point energy, you're probably contracting spaceime. Imagine this is a cube of energy in spaceime. This is also a cube of spaceime and here to over here I'm this distance right now. If I pull the energy out of this cube, I imagine it to shrink sucking the energy out. And now the distance is no longer as long as it was before. To me that's curvature of spacetime doing that effect. And that's what I think happens when we tap into zero point energy. And that is also how I think we can fundamentally teleport. At least that's a conceptual view of how that would function. It may not be exactly how it ends up working, but that's how I think of it. [sighs] Okay. Uh I can't remember if there's something else I wanted to listen to on this. Let's go one like another 30 seconds. >> There's a relationship between gravity and mass. That's all we know. >> That's another show we're going to do. Hyperdimensionality torsion. >> Oops. >> All that stuff. So So, so spaceime it's flat. >> I don't know if it's flat, but it's not curve. So, it's not curved that. >> Okay. Well, that's good enough, I think, on that one. Now, the last thing that I wanted to go over tonight, which is somewhat related, I tried to find a video for this [clears throat] and I couldn't. Maybe we can find one right now. There's something called [snorts] oh I'm going to butcher this name too. Alias effect Maurice alias 1954 found a relatively unique effect that is directly related to what we were just looking at. Here you go. I'm going to call it alias effect. Hopefully I'm pronouncing this correctly. refers to a reported yet controversial observations that pendulum swings exhibit sudden unexplained changes in rotation or direction. Sometimes appearing to even move backwards during a solar eclipse. So high level, what am I talking about? A pendulum swings back and forth. Sweet. We are on a rotating rock. You can tell because if you have a pendulum swinging back and forth for 24 hours, it's going to spin with the axis of the Earth. It will rotate with the Earth. your pendulum will. So if this is true, then during an eclipse, there should be no change whatsoever. From a classic mechanics viewpoint, if I do a pendulum during eclipse, it should still just rotate like normal. And yet this guy did this experiment in 1954 during an eclipse and he found out the pendulum shift changes changes. And the only explanation anyone could come up with assuming that it's real is that it must be related to electromagnetics. Has to be. Why? Because what happens during a solar eclipse? The sun gets blocked out. This means for a brief moment, the electromagnetic rays from the sun are no longer directly hitting us anymore. They've been blocked by the moon. So, if we're seeing some kind of weird effect during a solar eclipse, it must be because of the lack of electromagnetic rays or the change in the electromagnetic rays from before or after. That's what this effect argues. And why is that weird? Why is that relevant? Because the guy just told us that when you turned off the electromagnetic devices in our probe, we accidentally hit the moon. This this directly says there is empirical evidence that the electromagnetic effects can have forces. Forces can appear. real forces exist that we're that we can't explain in the classical framework fundamentally equivalent to the idea that the the potentials in the Arenhoff bomb effect are what cause the effects, not the fields, the potentials. And therefore there may be other ways that we can see real effects through electromagnetics that are not explained from classical physics. Boom. Mic drop. So let me read the rest of this here guys. says in 1954 during a solar eclipse he recorded the pendulum turning by for 13.5 degrees when normally it should have only uh shifted by a little bit less than that if you add this up times 14 should have been a different shift. Um the effect is highly controversial. Some subsequent experiments supported it many have failed to replicate it. And this is the thing too. What have we learned? People always try to replicate it. And the moment you see one failed replication, everybody says it's fake. This we've seen this in Cold Fusion. We've seen this in LK99. We've seen this many times over the years is that people are willing to discount something. If one person says it doesn't work, but if many people says something does work, they will not give it the same credit. As far as I can tell, there has not been any high quality tests of this. So, during the next solar eclipse, one of my engineer followers out there who is, you know, um, uh, ambitious, this might be something for you to look into because we're trying to find experiments that can push the traditional boundaries of classical physics. Let's see if we can find a video real quick. Um, yeah. See, there's nothing basically. Oh, here we go. This is the pendulum to to watch the world turn. My guess is if I play this in super speed, you'll you'll watch it like shift. Today, we get to play with Fuko's pendulum. >> Let's see if this works. Playback speed. 155%. Let's see if this works. Yeah. So, this is what you're talking about here. So you can see how it shifts a little bit. Is this Is it running? Oh, it's not. Here we go. See how it shifts around? Rotates like this. That shows that the Earth is rotating right there. So if this were to somehow change during the solar eclipse, we would have to understand why. Because as far as we know, the only thing that should impact this is the rotation of the Earth. Boom. Another great experiment. Now, moment of Zen for tonight, and though we'll do some super chats. My favorite experiment. I'm probably going to repost this tonight. I've been thinking about some of my favorite experiments that are out there. And since we have been talking about extra dimensions and particle accelerators and all this stuff, let's go ahead and show you that the ether has not been disproven. Many of you out there may say, "Wait a minute, Ashton. I thought the Michaelelsson Moley experiment in 1989 or 1889, 150 years ago, I thought that disproved the stationary ether. Well, let's take the Michaelson Moley experiment and let's go ahead and turn it on its side. Take the same Michaelelsson Mory experiment which is just an intererometer and we're going to turn it on its side. First thing we're going to do is we are going to have our our our this is the normal Michaelelsson Mley experiment just laser interferometer. We can see there's no ether. No ether. You spin it around and there's no phase change here. Nothing's shifting. So that means there there's no ether or you know nothing's interacting. Right? This is the original Michaelelsson Morley experiment. This is what ruled out the ether. You're looking at it. The problem, chat, as we've learned is that science is a liar sometimes. And every great idea that was once to believe to be unassalable ultimately gets upended by some basic [ __ ] by some basic [ __ ] And here's the most basic change you could have ever applied to the Michaelelsson Mley experiment. Turn it on its side. Just turn it on its side. Let's see what happens. Okay. So, I'm going to turn it on its side. Now, it's spinning vertically instead of horizontally. So, if there's no ether, we should see no phase shift. UH OH. UHOH, CHAT. I'm seeing a phase shift, chat. I'm seeing a phase shift and it slows down and starts spinning the other way. It's actually changes direction after it gets to a certain axis point. And when you measure where that access point is, where it changes from going left to going right, where do you think that access point is, chat? Where do you think it changes? Oh, it changes at exactly horizontal to the plane of the earth. Exactly horizontal to the plane of the earth is when you see that shift change left to right. So there's the example right there. So he's saying when you see it change is because I think he he draws the gra the lines in here. I think when the mirrors are perfectly flat to the plane of the earth right there, that's why you see those flat lines right there. That's when you see that sh that phase shift change. So what does this mean? How do we interpret this? If this was literally the experiment that was used to disprove the ether and all I have to do to get a positive result is to turn it on its side. What's the difference? How do I interpret that? And why when it's perfectly level is that the ch the point where the phase shift changes from left to right. Why? Simple. Gravity. Gravity is the difference. The only difference between this point and this point up here, if I'm if I'm shifted, is gravity. There's more gravity down here. There's less gravity up here. The closer you are to the center of the Earth, there's more gravity. The less close you are to the center of the Earth, there's less gravity. And what is gravity? Gravity is the displacement of the zero point energy. So, what does that mean? That means there is an ether. That means that video proves there is an ether. That video is measuring gravity and it's measuring the displacement of the ether by the earth. That's what that's measuring when we watch that spin vertically around. So gravity is a pressure force of the displacement of the ether. Wow. There you go. That's your moment of zen for tonight chat. Like, share, and subscribe, guys. Let's go to the super chats. Thank you everybody in the pill chat. Thank you raising Kane. Happy hump day. Raising Kane give 17 117 gold pills chat. [ __ ] I'm going to be a dragon. I'm be like the smog. I'm going to start a little treasure with all these gold pills I got. Um John Glock gets a cookie. Says according to Bob Greener and his wife uh his wife and children do not give an F about fusion and physics. He often discusses the yin and yang aspects of Matsumoto's SEM scans. A fitting analogy to say that we each we each other we need each other as much as we need this information. Group hug to the chat. Okay, everybody. John Glock gives you guys a group hug in the chat. Gorilla gives a can. The pendulum situation is explainable. Feel free to explain it, my dude. I can't see how it could be explainable throughout anything other than electromagnetic waves because the only difference is the sun's not shining anymore. But I'm happy to hear any explanations and I'm open to it. I'm a pretty open-minded guy as much as people think want to try to uh pigeon hole me. YouTube super chats and thank you guys in the uh Rumble chat. Laughing cat, appreciate you and thank you very much. Double M's as well. Appreciate you guys. Zaparoo Ashen, here's my four orbs matching my thankfulness donation. Thank you, Zaparoo. You're the bomb. And War Ranch, you are as well. Blue more than a whistle. Yep. Blue plasma balls. Why doesn't China call us out for spitting their plane through the wormhole? This is a great question. Why did China not say that the United States was responsible? Isn't that weird? They know the United States did it. In fact, I would argue everybody knows the United States did it. So, there's only a few explanations for this. And the one that I was thinking about earlier today, they all know about this technology. China knows about this technology. Russia knows about this technology. The United States knows about this technology. None of them are talking about it. They're all covering it up. The question is why? And that's what keeps me up at night. Why would Russia, China, and the United States all agree without even probably coordinating that they should all cover up this technology, not talk about it publicly because they know the implications of it? The implications of it are so big that they all know the public cannot be told. The public cannot accept it. And even if they did, even if China came out and said, "Yep, the United States has got wormhole technology," most people on social media would laugh at them. Most people would say, "This is Chinese disinformation." No doubt. I mean, go look at social media, guys. So, even if they wanted to, it probably wouldn't work. Although you could say now that we've been making it more socially acceptable, I could imagine a world in the future where China does come out and they say we know what the United States did to that plane or something like that. So don't rule it out, guys. Never say never. Scarlet Pumpern Nickel gives that super sticker. Thank you very much. I appreciate it. Okay, guys. Let's see. Did I have anything else to go over here tonight? That's about it, guys. Okay. Thank you guys very much for hanging out with me tonight. We're going to be back on Friday. Actually, in fact, tomorrow. Tomorrow. I better get this this name down. We are going to be talking about UFOs. I'll be live tomorrow at 7 o'clock with Parano Paramount Tactical, guys. Gary Melton. Paramount Tactical. Follow him. I'll repost it during work tomorrow. tomorrow night chatting about UFOs, ta chatting about special operations, chatting about what's going on with aliens and fusion reactors. Check that out. And then Friday, we'll be back with some felony physics for you guys. Have a great night. Love you. MH370X. Peace out, everybody. Later. [music] Out in the fields [music] where the skies are wide, talking about a journey through the cosmic ride. Einstein and Thorn, [music] they set the stage for a trip through time across the space age. Wormholes connect distant points in space. Traversible paths to a far off place. No black holes [music] pull, no crushing weight, just a cosmic tunnel to a distant gate. Talking wormholes, stargates, negative energy [music] travel through the cosmos. It's our destiny. MH370. Where did it go? Bowling trip 7 through a wormhole. But we're talking wormhole. Stargates [music] negative energy. Travel through the cosmos. It's our destiny. MH370. Where did it [music] go? Boing trip 7 through a wormhole flow. >> [music] >> Exotic [music] matter, negative energy is the key to stabilize the wormhole for you and me. Quantum vacuums squeeze so tight, creating [music] conditions for this wondrous flight. Static fields and lasers in the lab they play, generating forces in a new kind of way. Gravitational squeezing cast force negative zones. We need to stay the course. Talking wormholes, [music] stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos. It's our destiny. MH370. [music] Where did it go? Bing 7 through a wormhole flow. Thin shell formalism [music] plate so fine. Spherical geometry. We realign energy [music] conditions that we must defy for a stable wormhole. Let's give it a try. [music] [music] [music] [bell] Cool. Forces balancing the plate, creating the throat, opening gates from Earth to the stars in a single bound. A shortcut through space. Profound. Engineers and [music] dreamers hold the key to future worlds and what we could be. With science in hand, we forge ahead through the cosmic paths that we now tread. We're talking wormholes, stargates, [music] negative energy. Travel through the cosmos star destiny. Mh. [music] Where did it go? Going triple 7 through a wormhole flow. From the fields [music] to the stars, we break the chains. Understanding the universe, we make the gain. Lil Hula Crunk [music] shines, bringing truth to light. Through his music, we'll explore the night with wormholes and stargates. Our path is clear. Exploring the cosmos. Our future.