Continuous Energy Movement
Argues that claiming electron clouds have no movement because time slices show shapes is incorrect.
This theory falls within the Energy & Physics research cluster, exploring advanced propulsion, fusion reactor designs, and unconventional energy technologies that may operate outside the boundaries of publicly acknowledged science.
Supporting Points
- Even waves involve movement and action
- Shape changes over time indicate movement is occurring
- Time slice photography does not prove stability only specific moments
Claims from This Video
Classical physics predicts electrons should spiral into nucleus within 10 to the minus 11 seconds.
Experiments prove atoms are stable lasting much longer than classical predictions allow.
Orbital shapes in chemistry represent definite energy wave shapes not particle orbits.
Louis de Broglie 1924 thesis proposed electrons should be thought of as waves rather than particles.
Quantum mechanics went off the rails when it tried to understand wave function collapse.
Mainstream physics arbitrarily claimed classical and quantum worlds work differently to avoid admitting error.
Charles Chase challenged Sean Caroll claiming zero point energy would be proven usable within his lifetime.
Physics community makes up explanations like dark energy and dark matter instead of reexamining foundations.
Hal Puthoff 1987 paper proposed zero point energy keeps electrons elevated preventing collapse.
Wave function collapse interpretation is nonsensical because electrons cannot know if they are being observed.